Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AMedP-8.5
The nation running an in-theatre military medical treatment facility, and the laboratory unit assigned to it at that facility's role
AMedP-8.5 sets NATO's minimum laboratory test menu for in-theatre military medical treatment facilities, scaled to each facility's role, under nations' agreement in STANAG 2571.
AMedP-8.5 is the NATO Allied Medical Publication (AMedP) that sets the minimum laboratory test menu a deployed military medical treatment facility (MTF) has to be able to run, scaled to the facility's role. Its own aim is "to define the minimum requirements for laboratory services for in-theatre MTFs." It carries the technical detail behind STANAG 2571, the agreement recording nations' commitment to use it: the promulgation letter states plainly that "the agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in" STANAG 2571.
The document addresses nations, not a commercial supplier or a patient. "Nations are responsible for assigning the proper laboratory staff based on operational requirements," and it is a nation's own force generation and mission planning, not a contract or a certificate, that turns this publication's minimum test menu into a specific deployed facility's capability. It has force across NATO's membership - "NATO with its new participants now has 30 member nations and many MTFs" - wherever one of those nations deploys an in-theatre MTF.
All of the testable content sits in a single annex, organised as a matrix: laboratory test categories down the page, five facility roles - Role 1 through Role 3 - across it, and each cell marked necessary, recommended, or left blank to mean optional. The document is explicit about how to read the marking: a checked test is necessary, "while the rest of them both included and not included in the table are optional," and a check mark carrying a star indicates a recommendation rather than a requirement. The number of necessary tests rises with facility role, from the lightest facility up to Role 3, which the annex treats as the fullest laboratory capability. One area sits outside that escalation entirely: "Microbiology and other specialized testing (CBRN, Pathology, Drugs) should be considered on an operational basis," rather than being fixed against a specific role at all.
A reader checking whether a facility meets AMedP-8.5 will not find a single yes or no in the annex. The letter of promulgation carries a page of national reservations recorded at the time nations agreed to the standard, and they read as genuinely different positions rather than a formality: one nation recording that its armed forces do not yet have a laboratory diagnostic capacity of their own, another noting that a given facility role does not always deploy with a laboratory at all, and a third recording that its naval forces have no Role 3 facility, with that level of care provided ashore by the national health system instead. The document itself notes that this list is not exhaustive and points to the NATO Standardization Document Database for the current position. Edition B, Version 1 (June 2023) supersedes Edition A, Version 2, which nations were told to destroy under their own document-destruction procedure.
There is no certification, audit or notified-body scheme attached to AMedP-8.5. What NATO records instead is each nation's own declared compliance status, and the gaps in it, through the reservations described above; there is no third party auditing a facility's laboratory against the annex, and no certificate an organisation can hold against this document.
AMedP-8.5 is free of charge, published by the NATO Standardization Office. We do not sell it or host a copy. It can be retrieved from the NATO Standardization Document Database, where NATO should be credited on reproduction.
AMedP-8.5 is a technical requirements document about a deployed medical capability, not a management system: the substance of meeting it is running the laboratory to the required test menu, which is done in the facility itself, not in software. What an organisation supporting that work can still usefully hold under control is the evidence trail behind the capability - the record of which tests a given role's laboratory is equipped and staffed to run, the training record showing laboratory personnel are current against the menu for their role, the equipment and consumables inventory tied to that menu, and the documentation behind any reservation a nation has recorded against a role. ComplyTrain gives an organisation supporting that work a controlled place to hold and version those procedures and records, and to produce them quickly when a coalition partner or a national inspector asks what a facility's laboratory is actually equipped to do.
It does not run the tests, calibrate the analysers, or decide what a casualty's care requires. Which roles a nation commits a given facility to, and what that means for its laboratory, is set by national force generation and the standard's own annex, not by us. If you support a nation's medical logistics or laboratory readiness and want to see what else sits alongside AMedP-8.5, the standards explorer lists the related publications, or talk to us about the evidence side of that work.
Tell us how you need to work with AMedP-8.5 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds a nation once that nation has agreed to use it, an agreement recorded in STANAG 2571, and a nation can ratify with reservations, as several did at this edition. Whether a specific facility currently meets the annex in full is a matter of that nation's own declared position, not a general rule this document sets.
The annex sets requirements across five facility roles, from Role 1 up to Role 3, with the number of necessary tests increasing as the role increases. The document does not itself define what each role means operationally; it only sets the laboratory test menu for each one.
No. AMedP-8.5 does not name ISO 15189, ISO/IEC 17025, an external quality assessment programme, or any other accreditation scheme. It sets a minimum test menu per facility role and leaves how a laboratory achieves and evidences its own quality to national arrangements.
STANAG 2571 is the agreement by which nations commit to use AMedP-8.5; AMedP-8.5 is the technical publication that carries the actual minimum test requirements. A nation ratifies the STANAG, and the AMedP is where the testable detail lives.
Edition B, Version 1, promulgated in June 2023. It supersedes Edition A, Version 2, which nations were instructed to destroy under their own document-destruction procedure on receipt of the new edition.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.