Start a free trial
Menu

AMedP-9.1

AMedP-9.1 modular approach for multinational medical facilities

Lead Nations and Contributing Nations planning or building a multinational medical treatment facility from national modules

AMedP-9.1 sets out NATO's modular approach for building a multinational medical treatment facility from national modules, and how Lead and Contributing Nations agree responsibility for it.

Edition
A
Published
2018-11

What it is

What AMedP-9.1 covers

AMedP-9.1 is the NATO Allied Medical Publication that sets out a modular approach to building a Multinational Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) from contributions made by more than one nation. Its own aim is "to set the basis for the creation of standardized component modules of personnel and equipment able to be rearranged, replaced, combined and interchanged easily in order to create Multinational Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) able to meet specific operational requirements." Edition A, Version 1 was promulgated in November 2018. The document is not written for an equipment manufacturer or software supplier; it speaks to the national medical authorities that decide to lead or contribute to a facility built this way, working within NATO's Operations Planning Process and Defence Planning Process.

Rather than fixing how many staff or how much equipment a facility needs, AMedP-9.1 groups the functional building blocks into modules and leaves the detailed capability and skills content to two companion publications: AMedP-1.7, the Capability Matrix, and AMedP-1.8, the Skills Matrix. The document is explicit that a module's definition "neither includes the personnel number nor any equipment list": those depend on the specific operation and the contributing nation's own situation.

Core, enhancing and complementary modules

Every module is meant to stand as a self-contained functional unit. AMedP-9.1 describes a module as "a self-contained entity that includes personnel, equipment, materiel and procedures whose final output is a specific functional capability," and the document classifies modules into three groups.

Seven core modules make up what the document calls a Role 2 Basic: Emergency Area, Surgery, Specified Diagnostic, Patient Holding, Post-operative/high dependency care, Command, Control, Communication, Computer and Information, and Medical Supply. Fourteen enhancing modules can be added to raise a Role 2 Basic to a Role 2 Enhanced, chosen from what the document calls the "NATO medical toolbox" according to the mission's needs; a Role 2 Enhanced does not have to include every enhancing module available. A third, non-exhaustive group, complementary contributions, covers things like oxygen production, telemedicine or additional clinical specialties, and can be added to either a Role 2 Basic or a Role 2 Enhanced. This page names the kinds of module the document distinguishes; it does not reproduce the capability, staffing or equipment detail behind each one, which sits in AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8.

Lead Nation and Contributing Nation responsibilities

Every Multinational MTF built under this approach operates under a Lead Nation, which coordinates the facility, and one or more Contributing Nations, which supply modules. AMedP-9.1 describes the Lead Nation's areas of responsibility, not as an exhaustive list, but spanning mission analysis and coordination with NATO commands, operational planning, provision of key enabling capabilities, establishing interoperability requirements between modules, deployment arrangements, medical command and control (including appointing the facility's Commanding Officer or Clinical Director), SOP development, clinical governance coordinated with the Contributing Nations, medical records, an integration and pre-deployment training programme, and evaluation in accordance with AMedP-1.6. The Lead Nation can arrange for another nation to actually deliver a capability it is responsible for, but it stays accountable for that capability being available.

Contributing Nations are expected to cooperate in the preliminary planning, keep their contributed equipment functioning, deploy nationally certified and trained personnel, run their own module self-assessment and evaluation under AMedP-1.6, take part in the Lead Nation's integration training programme, certify any personnel they provide on another nation's behalf in accordance with AMedP-8.3, and keep their module working "as close as possible to 100% on a 24/7 basis." None of this is prescribed once and for all: AMedP-9.1 states plainly that the establishment of a Multinational MTF "will always require for the participating Nations to reach an agreement depicting the respective tasks and responsibilities, which may differ according to the situation," through a Memorandum of Understanding, Technical Arrangement or similar instrument that the document itself does not template.

What this page does not cover

AMedP-9.1's own scope excludes legal and financial questions, leaving them to the agreements nations establish between themselves, and this page follows that boundary rather than filling the gap. It also does not reproduce the personnel numbers, equipment lists, bed counts or planning ratios behind any module: those are worked out from the specific operation's requirements and are the subject of AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8, not of this document or this page.

How we help

AMedP-9.1 is a nation-to-nation planning framework, not a management system a piece of software could implement. Deciding to lead or contribute to a Multinational MTF, negotiating the agreement that covers it, and settling module composition are judgements and negotiations between national medical authorities, not something a document platform does.

Where the work looks like familiar compliance work is in the paperwork a contributing organisation assembles around its own piece of that commitment: the standard operating procedures a Lead Nation develops for the facility, the records showing personnel were trained and nationally certified before deployment, the module self-assessment records a Contributing Nation produces ahead of AMedP-1.6 evaluation, and the maintenance evidence a module owner keeps to show its equipment is being kept up to date. ComplyTrain holds that kind of evidence, procedures, controlled documents and training records, as an auditable trail, so an organisation contributing a module has a clear record of what was in place and when.

ComplyTrain does not negotiate the inter-nation agreement, decide module composition, or take any part in the evaluation the document describes; those stay with the nations, the Lead Nation and the NATO command structure. Which modules a specific facility needs, and which other Allied Publications and STANAGs come with it, is set by the operational requirement and the contract, not by us. The standards explorer shows the other publications in the medical family, and we are glad to talk through how you would document a module contribution to this kind of facility.

Standards it references

Questions

Is AMedP-9.1 mandatory?

It is a promulgated NATO Standard, and several nations recorded formal reservations against this edition at the time of promulgation, which is how a nation qualifies its own commitment to it. Beyond that, the modular approach only takes effect for a specific facility once participating nations reach their own agreement on tasks and responsibilities, whether for a standing facility or one assembled for a particular operation.

Can a company be "AMedP-9.1 certified"?

No. AMedP-9.1 names no certification scheme a company could hold. What it does describe is a Contributing Nation certifying the personnel it deploys, and NATO's own evaluation and validation of the assembled facility under AMedP-1.6, feeding the facility's initial and full operational capability. Neither is a certificate an organisation holds against this document.

What is the difference between AMedP-9.1 and AMedP-9.2?

AMedP-9.1 sets out the modular approach itself: how modules are classified and how Lead Nation and Contributing Nation responsibilities are divided. AMedP-9.2 is where the templates for the Memoranda of Understanding and other agreements, and a list of non-clinical SOPs, "can be found."

Does AMedP-9.1 define how many staff or beds a module needs?

No, deliberately. The document states that a module's definition "neither includes the personnel number nor any equipment list": staffing and equipment are worked out from the specific operation's requirements and the contributing nation's own situation, using the detail in AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8.

What is the difference between a Role 2 Basic and a Role 2 Enhanced?

A Role 2 Basic is made up of all seven core modules. A Role 2 Enhanced adds capability drawn from a set of fourteen enhancing modules, chosen according to the mission, host nation support, climate and other factors; it does not have to include every enhancing module available. Complementary contributions can be added to either.