Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
ATrainP-2
National training establishments and instructors responsible for delivering their armed forces' training in the law of armed conflict, and the legal advisors who support them
ATrainP-2 sets NATO's minimum standard for training national armed forces in the law of armed conflict, binding nations rather than companies.
ATrainP-2 is the NATO Allied Training Publication that sets the minimum standard for training national armed forces in the law of armed conflict (LOAC). It exists to "standardize training in the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) by establishing a minimum standard of training to ensure that NATO operations are conducted in accordance with LOAC, where applicable." Nations commit to it through STANAG 2449 - "the agreement of nations to use this publication" - and the duty to deliver the training lands on nations, not companies: "Nations are required to train their personnel in LOAC. LOAC training is a national responsibility." It is Edition B, Version 1, promulgated in June 2019, superseding Edition A, Version 1.
The publication names its own reader plainly: it "is envisioned to serve as a tool and guideline for (national) instructors in the preparation and conduct of their (national) training in the LOAC." Commanders are told to "ensure that personnel under their command are aware of their obligations under LOAC and that they comply with LOAC," and nations must "ensure that legal advisors are available, when necessary, to advise military commanders at the appropriate level on the application of LOAC." There is no supplier, contractor or acquirer role anywhere in the text. A company does not train against ATrainP-2; a nation's armed forces do, and a company meets it only at one remove, by knowing what training the personnel it works alongside are expected to have received.
Ratification can carry reservations, and this edition's front matter records several: Belgium, Germany and the United States each qualified parts of the training material, mostly around the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, which not every NATO nation has ratified. That matters operationally, not just legally: officers are told to "know that in multinational operations obligations may vary among personnel of different nationalities according to national law or LOAC obligations, and reflect this in the planning and conduct of operations."
Chapter 1 sets nine instruction principles that read like a checklist. Every person is to be trained, not only specialists, and training is folded into "all levels of military education, individual and collective training, and exercises" rather than delivered once. Depth scales with rank: a basic curriculum applies to everyone (Annex B), a more detailed one to non-commissioned officers (Annex C), and a further one to officers (Annex D). Specialised training, described as non-exhaustive, is expected for named categories of personnel (Annex E). Training must use "properly trained instructors," include "scenarios, exercises and practical field training" with particular emphasis before and during NATO operations, and its effectiveness is to be "evaluated at all levels of command," with lessons learned fed into future programmes. Nations are also asked to "regularly inform each other of LOAC training programmes."
Annex B's baseline runs through LOAC's applicability and its relationship to national law, the four basic principles (military necessity, distinction, proportionality, humanity), combatants, protected persons, other battlefield actors, protective emblems, protected objects, means and methods of warfare, and enforcement (state, command and individual responsibility, war crimes). Annex C repeats it for NCOs with the added expectation that they can "fulfil their command responsibilities relating to LOAC and LOAC violations." Annex D extends it again for officers, adding truce and armistice, the law of occupation, and the multinational-obligations point above. Annex E lists roles that "may be provided with specialized LOAC training": commanding officers, flag and general officers, legal advisors, medical personnel, military police, personnel involved in targeting, personnel who handle captured persons, pilots and aircrew, religious personnel, special operations forces, and civil servants deploying on operations.
Annex A backs all of this with a non-exhaustive list of the treaties LOAC training draws on - the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, the Hague Conventions and Regulations, and the specialist conventions on chemical, biological, cluster and anti-personnel weapons - with the caution that the list "does not impose any obligation on States that are not party to one or more of the listed treaties."
Annex F is the bulk of the document: it runs from F-1 to F-125, more than three-quarters of the publication's 158 pages. It is an adaptable slide-deck template with suggested slide text and instructor notes covering the substantive law an instructor would teach, from the basic principles through combatant and protected-person status, the ICRC's role, protective emblems and protected objects, prohibited weapons and methods, planning and targeting precautions, the law of occupation, and enforcement. It is explicitly a starting point, not a script: "this training module template does not prescribe the substance of LOAC that must be taught because it fully recognizes that each TCN is responsible for providing LOAC instruction based on national obligations and interpretations," and instructors are told to consult their legal advisors "for additional support and guidance as to the appropriate, nationally approved content."
There is no certification scheme. ATrainP-2 names no accredited body, notified body or inspector who signs off a nation's training. Evaluation is a national exercise: nations "are encouraged to evaluate their national LOAC training programmes" using "a combination of methods," which "may include classroom assessment, test papers and field training scenarios." Above individual programmes, effectiveness is meant to be reviewed "at all levels of command," with after-action lessons folded back in.
ATrainP-2 is published by the NATO Standardization Office and, like every NATO standardization document, carries no charge. The Standardization Document Database is the authoritative source; we neither sell nor host a copy ourselves.
The actual work ATrainP-2 asks for - legal training delivered by qualified instructors, drawing on a nation's own approved LOAC content - happens in the classroom and the field, not in software. What ComplyTrain can genuinely help with sits around that work: holding the training programme documentation Annexes B to D call for, recording who was trained, when, and against which curriculum, keeping the evaluation records a national programme generates, and tracking that the specialised training in Annex E reached the roles who needed it, from legal advisors to personnel who handle captured persons.
What ComplyTrain does not do: it does not write, approve or deliver LOAC training content, and it is no substitute for the qualified legal advisors this publication itself says a nation must provide. Which training standard and tier apply to a company's own personnel is set by the customer nation's programme and the contract's quality clause, never by us. The standards explorer shows what else sits alongside ATrainP-2, including STANAG 2449 and the related detention and rules-of-engagement publications, and we are glad to talk through where a specific requirement leaves your organisation.
Tell us how you need to work with ATrainP-2 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds through STANAG 2449, the agreement by which NATO nations commit to use it. A nation can ratify with reservations, as this edition's front matter shows for Belgium, Germany and the United States, so whether a specific point applies depends on which nation and which reservation, not on the publication simply existing.
Not directly. It addresses nations and their national instructors, and the training duty it describes is a national responsibility. A company meets it only at one remove, by knowing what LOAC training the personnel it works alongside, or a customer's contract, expects.
STANAG 2449 is the agreement by which nations commit to use ATrainP-2. ATrainP-2 is the training content itself - the curriculum, the annexed programmes for each audience, and the slide-deck template.
No. It sets minimum topics and a template, but says plainly that each nation is responsible for the actual content, based on its own national obligations and interpretations. Annex F's slide template is a starting point instructors adapt, not a script.
This page describes Edition B, Version 1, promulgated in June 2019, which superseded Edition A, Version 1. The document does not state a scheduled review date.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.