Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANREC 4790
Engineers and nations deciding whether to build AEP-72, Volume V into NATO forces' protective equipment and procedures
STANREC 4790 is NATO's voluntary recommendation that nations use AEP-72, Volume V, Edition A when designing protective equipment and procedures for NATO forces; it does not bind anyone to adopt it.
STANREC 4790 is a NATO Standardization Recommendation (STANREC), a different instrument from a STANAG. Where a STANAG asks nations to ratify an agreement and then implement it domestically, a STANREC only ever recommends. The document itself states plainly that it "is a non-binding document employed on a voluntary basis and does not require commitment of the nations to implement the standards which are listed in it." Nobody is obliged to do anything because STANREC 4790 exists.
The one substantive thing STANREC 4790 does is name a publication: it recommends that nations use AEP-72, Volume V, Edition A. AEP-72 is an Allied Engineering Publication issued in several volumes, each covering a different category of CBRN hazard, and Volume V is the one this STANREC addresses. This page is about the recommendation, not about AEP-72 Volume V's technical content, which sits in that publication and is out of scope here.
The stated purpose is design guidance: "protective equipment and procedures for NATO forces should be designed to allow unaffected operations." In other words, this is an input to designing equipment and writing operating procedures, not an operational risk-assessment tool.
STANREC 4790 addresses NATO nations and NATO bodies, not a supplier directly. It becomes relevant to industry only at one remove: a nation, or a contract that follows national practice, has to separately call up AEP-72 Volume V before a designer or a supplier has anything to work to. Watching for that reference in a tender or a specification is the trigger, not the existence of this recommendation. "Nations and NATO bodies may propose changes, at any time, through a standardization proposal to the tasking authority," which is the mechanism by which nations, not suppliers, keep it current.
Because the underlying work is about how protective equipment "should be designed," the point in a project's life where it matters is design, well before acceptance testing. Retrofitting protective performance into equipment that is already built costs far more than designing for it from the outset.
STANREC 4790 is one of several sibling recommendations built the same way, each pointing at a different volume of AEP-72: STANREC 4741 covers the chemical-agent volume, STANREC 4742 the toxic-industrial-chemicals volume, and STANREC 4743 the biological-warfare-agent volume. A related recommendation, STANREC 4730, covers capability and systems requirements for detection, identification and monitoring equipment rather than design challenge levels.
The wider family of CBRN protective-equipment documents it sits alongside includes STANREC 4548 and AEP-38 on protective clothing, STANREC 4725 and AEP-71 on respirator testing, STANREC 4727 and AEP-73 on protective masks, STANREC 4634 and AEP-54 on collective protection, and STANAG 4653 with AEP-58 on decontamination equipment. STANAG 4521 and AEP-07 cover CBRN contamination survivability in equipment design and acceptance more broadly, and STANAG 2521, STANAG 2522 and ATP-3.8.1 cover CBRN defence on operations. STANAG 2103 with ATP-45 covers CBRN warning, reporting and hazard prediction, and STANAG 2553 covers NATO's planning guide for CBRN casualty estimation. None of these is a requirement of STANREC 4790 itself; they are the neighbouring documents in the same programme.
STANREC 4790 is Edition 1, promulgated 20 September 2017, and "does not supersede any document." It sits within NATO's CNAD, AC/225 NAAG and JCBRND-CDG structure, and is reviewed at least once every three years, with any nation or NATO body free to propose a change to the tasking authority at any time.
STANREC 4790 is a recommendation, not a piece of software, and the engineering work of designing protective equipment or writing operating procedures against a radiological hazard is done by specialists working from AEP-72 Volume V itself, not by any compliance tool. What ComplyTrain does is the surrounding evidence work that any organisation touched by this kind of requirement has to do anyway: holding the record of which contract or specification actually named AEP-72 Volume V, tracking the design review or verification activity that shows it was considered, keeping the training record for the engineers and procedure-writers who need to know the requirement exists, and holding the audit trail a customer or a Government Quality Assurance representative would ask to see.
STANREC 4790 does not certify anything and neither does ComplyTrain: there is no accreditation scheme attached to this recommendation, and no tool can stand in for the radiological engineering assessment itself. The applicable tier, and the standards that come with it, are set by the contract and the customer's quality clause. The standards explorer shows what else in this family typically travels alongside AEP-72, and we're glad to talk through what evidencing that work looks like in practice.
Tell us how you need to work with STANREC 4790 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. It is a NATO Standardization Recommendation, and its own implementation clause says it "is a non-binding document employed on a voluntary basis and does not require commitment of the nations to implement the standards which are listed in it." A nation may choose to adopt AEP-72 Volume V, or a contract may call it up, but the STANREC itself commits nobody.
Nothing on its own. Its one substantive clause recommends that nations use AEP-72, Volume V, Edition A; the technical content lives in that publication, not in this recommendation.
A STANAG asks nations to ratify an agreement and then implement it domestically, so it can bind through that route. A STANREC only recommends: nations are invited to use what it points to, without any ratification obligation.
It sits within NATO's CNAD, AC/225 NAAG and JCBRND-CDG structure, with the United States of America as custodian. NATO reviews it at least once every three years, and any nation or NATO body may propose a change to the tasking authority at any time.
No such certification exists. NATO names no certification body for this recommendation, and ComplyTrain's role here is informational: helping an organisation hold the evidence that AEP-72 Volume V was considered, not certifying against it.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
A 90-day plan for the smallest defence suppliers: let the tender set your scope, document what you already do, fix the security basics primes check, and keep the system small enough for two people to maintain.
Learn how to qualify, approve and monitor sub-suppliers, flow down requirements through purchase orders, and keep the records an auditor will ask to see under ISO 9001 clause 8.4 and AQAP.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.