Start a free trial
Menu

AAMedP-1.13

AAMedP-1.13 minimum requirements for high-G aircrew training

National aeromedical training establishments that qualify aircrew for flying in a high sustained G environment

NATO's minimum requirements for how a nation trains and qualifies aircrew for flying in a high sustained G environment, covering medical oversight, briefing, equipment and refresher training.

Edition
A
Published
2017-10

What it is

AAMedP-1.13 is the NATO Allied Aeromedical Publication that sets the minimum requirements for training aircrew who fly in high onset and high sustained "G" (HSG) conditions (clause 1.1). AAMedP stands for Allied Aeromedical Publication. Edition A, Version 1 was promulgated in October 2017; the document names no earlier edition it superseded and sets no scheduled review date. It sits under STANAG 3827, the ratified agreement by which a NATO nation commits to the requirements this publication sets out, and which gives it force.

AAMedP-1.13 addresses the national authority that runs a NATO nation's aeromedical training establishment, not a supplier or a manufacturer. The aircrew who receive the training are its subject, identified by each nation (clause 2.1), not the party the document is written to. Several NATO nations have recorded formal reservations against it on the document's own record pages: Belgium reads what a completed course qualifies a pilot for more narrowly than the document implies, Canada and the United Kingdom record that their own equipment cannot meet what the document specifies, and the Czech Republic, Romania and Slovenia each record that they do not currently hold the centrifuge equipment the document assumes exists. Ratifying the cover STANAG and fully implementing this publication are, in practice, separate steps.

What a national training programme has to provide

Chapter 2 sets out, clause by clause, what a nation's HSG training programme has to provide:

  • Aircrew training (2.1): aircrew identified by each nation whose employment exposes them to the HSG environment should receive training certified by a qualifying centrifuge run, aimed at building awareness of the environment and the ability to apply the anti-G technique effectively.
  • Medical (2.2.1): "an appropriately qualified and competent physician shall be available throughout HSG training," and a trainee must meet national medical standards and satisfy pre-training medical requirements before training starts.
  • Briefing (2.2.2): trainees must be briefed beforehand on the physiological effects they may experience, on what can reduce their individual tolerance, and on the correct use of the anti-G technique - content left to the qualified staff delivering it, not reproduced here.
  • Equipment and positioning (2.2.3): "equipment must be maintained and monitored by appropriately qualified and competent personnel"; training uses a man-rated centrifuge fitted with communication and recording equipment, and each trainee uses anti-G equipment representative of their own aircraft type.
  • Qualification (2.2.4): a trainee is qualified once they complete the required run to the standard the clause sets.
  • Termination and training failure (2.2.5): a run can be stopped at any time, by the trainee or by the supervisor. Each nation sets its own physiological and medical criteria for when to stop a run, and where a trainee does not complete the qualification run, "if successful completion cannot be achieved, aeromedical disposition of the trainee shall be determined by national procedures."
  • Refresher training (2.3): qualification is not indefinite. The document sets a recurring retraining requirement to preserve currency, triggered by how long an aircrew member has been away from the high-G flying environment, with a shorter regular cycle recommended even for those who remain current.

What stands out is what the document does not set itself: the substantive medical and termination criteria stay with each nation and its aeromedical professionals. The document only requires that criteria exist and that qualified staff apply them.

No certification, and no obligation on a supplier

There is no accredited certification, no notified body and no third-party audit described here. The qualification this document describes is granted to an individual aircrew member by the national training establishment that runs the centrifuge, not a certificate an organisation can hold. Evaluation is self-administered by the nation: clause 2.2.5 states plainly that "physiological and medical criteria for terminating a centrifuge run shall be established by each participating nation," and leaves an unsuccessful trainee's disposition to national procedure in the same way. Where a nation cannot meet the requirement in full, it records that as a formal reservation reviewable through the NATO Standardization Document Database, rather than being caught by an external inspection.

This publication places no obligation on a software or compliance vendor. It binds a NATO nation's own aeromedical training establishment; a defence-sector supplier meets it only indirectly, where a contract or a customer's quality clause touches the training and currency records of aircrew.

Getting the document

NATO publishes AAMedP-1.13 through the NATO Standardization Document Database at no charge. ComplyTrain does not sell it or host a copy; the NSDD listing for AAMedP-1.13 is the source.

How we help

AAMedP-1.13 is an operational and technical standard, and the organisation it addresses is a NATO nation's own aeromedical training establishment, not a typical ComplyTrain customer. The work it describes, running the centrifuge programme, briefing trainees, applying medical and termination criteria, deciding an aeromedical disposition, is physiological and medical work carried out by qualified aeromedical professionals. It is not something software does.

Where this document becomes relevant to a defence-sector supplier is the paperwork around it: holding the training record and refresher-due date for personnel whose role requires this qualification, and keeping that evidence ready alongside the rest of a contract's quality requirements. ComplyTrain, as an auditable quality management system, supports that kind of record-keeping in general: controlled documents, training records and their renewal dates, and an audit trail a reviewing authority can inspect.

ComplyTrain does not conduct, administer or replace the physiological training, the medical oversight clause 2.2.1 requires, or the aeromedical disposition decisions clause 2.2.5 leaves to national procedures; those stay with the qualified physicians and training staff a nation's own establishment employs. Which standards apply to a given programme, and at what tier, is set by its contract and the customer's quality clause; see the standards explorer for what sits alongside AAMedP-1.13, and talk to us about evidencing your part of it.

Questions

Is AAMedP-1.13 mandatory?

It binds a NATO nation once that nation ratifies STANAG 3827, the agreement that covers it, but ratification and full implementation are separate steps: several nations have recorded reservations where their own equipment or procedures do not fully match the requirement. For a defence-sector supplier, whether it applies at all depends on a specific contract or customer quality clause, not on the document existing.

Does completing this training certify an organisation?

No. The document describes a qualification granted to an individual aircrew member by a national training establishment, not a certificate an organisation can hold, and it names no accredited certification body. Each nation sets its own criteria for stopping a run and for an unsuccessful trainee's disposition.

What is STANAG 3827?

STANAG 3827 is the NATO Standardization Agreement that covers AAMedP-1.13. Ratifying it is how a NATO nation commits to the training requirements this publication sets out; AAMedP-1.13 is the technical content, and the STANAG is the ratification instrument.

What edition of AAMedP-1.13 is current?

Edition A, Version 1, promulgated in October 2017. The document does not name an earlier edition it superseded, and no review date is recorded.