Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AJP-3.22
NATO commanders and staffs planning and conducting stability policing, not a commercial supplier directly
AJP-3.22 is NATO's Allied joint doctrine for stability policing, directing commanders and staffs on replacing or reinforcing an indigenous police force, binding nations through STANAG 2616.
AJP-3.22 is NATO's Allied Joint Doctrine for Stability Policing: the doctrine that tells a commander and staff how to plan and conduct the police-related activities a NATO-led force uses to reinforce, or temporarily replace, an indigenous police force. Its own lexicon defines stability policing as activities "intended to reinforce or temporarily replace the indigenous police in order to contribute to the restoration and/or upholding of the public order and security, rule of law, and the protection of human rights." Edition A, Version 1, was promulgated 14 July 2016 and is "effective upon receipt." The preface is explicit about why it was written: despite NATO's experience in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan, "there is no dedicated Allied Doctrine for Stability Policing (SP)" until this publication filled the gap. Nations agree to use it through STANAG 2616, so this is guidance for the people planning and running a mission, not a requirement written for a company.
AJP-3.22 never names a supplier, manufacturer or acquirer as its audience. It is addressed to the military chain of command: "the commander and his staff are responsible for defining policing rules of engagement (ROE), specific executive powers (e.g. search, arrest, use of force), rules for the escalation of force and clear lines of accountability." The forces it expects to actually perform stability policing are named directly too: "the natural providers of resources devoted to stability policing activities are Military Police inclusive of Gendarmerie type forces when operating in a non-permissive environment." A commercial party appears only at the edge of that picture. The doctrine allows that "non-military actors may collaborate in stability policing activities such as: police forces with civil status, IOs, NGOs, and contractors," but only "on the basis of the mandate and the environment being permissive." None of that makes AJP-3.22 a requirement a company implements directly. What it reaches is a nation, through STANAG 2616 and that nation's own military structure, and this edition's front matter already carries national reservations from Germany, France, Slovakia and Slovenia recording where each departs from the text.
The doctrine organises stability policing around two mission types, and the distinction that matters most is who holds executive police powers. Replacement applies "when the indigenous police or a recognised government is non-existent." Here, "NATO stability policing assets must be entitled with executive police powers, encompassing the use of force, as well as the power of search and arrest," covering tasks from area patrolling and control to criminal investigations and civil disturbance operations. Reinforcing applies when an indigenous police force exists but is not fully effective. Here the doctrine is just as direct in the other direction: "NATO stability policing assets will not be entitled to executive police powers, as these are retained by the indigenous police," and the role instead runs through named functions: monitoring, mentoring, advising, reforming (restructuring, rebuilding and inspecting), training and partnering. Chapter 3 then works through four stability activities the wider AJP 3 series already establishes: security and control, support to security sector reform (including disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration), support to restoration of services, and support to governance tasks. Annex A lists the specific tasks a stability policing capability may be asked to perform, from crowd and riot control, border control and election security through criminal investigations, forensics and biometrics to counter-terrorism and war crime investigations. Annex B sets out how the people who perform them are trained: three levels of general training, specialised training, on-the-job training, training of trainers, and a matrix of basic, advanced and management-level policing skills.
The doctrine returns to law, legitimacy and human rights throughout rather than in one clause. It states that "it is of paramount importance that all actions taken by a government and its agents in attempting to restore stability are legal and perceived as legitimate," and that "the rule of law, based on three pillars (law enforcement, judicial, and correctional) must be addressed concurrently, is fundamental to legitimate governance." Human rights violations appear as a listed factor under both mission types, and one of the named reforming functions, monitoring, is described as "observing, assessing and reporting (to the competent authority) on the performance of indigenous police forces, in order to ensure compliance with the human rights and best international police practices." Executive powers, including the use of force and the power of search and arrest, sit with NATO assets only in a replacement mission, as set out above.
AJP-3.22 describes itself as "linked with a number of AJP 3 series publications." It sits under AJP-3, the Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations, itself covered by STANAG 2490, and reads alongside AJP-3.2, Allied Land Operations, which it cites directly for the stability activities its own Chapter 3 elaborates. Beneath it sits the tactical-level guidance the text calls "ATP 3.2.1.1 Guidance for the Conduct of Tactical Stability Activities and Tasks," recorded in our catalogue as ATP-32 and covered by STANAG 2606. The standards explorer lists the rest of what sits alongside this document.
AJP-3.22 is published by the NATO Standardization Office and, like every NATO standardization document, carries no charge. The NSDD listing for AJP-3.22 is the authoritative source, and national standardization authorities can also supply a copy. We credit NATO for the catalogue and neither sell nor host a copy ourselves.
AJP-3.22 is doctrine for a military chain of command, so there is nothing here for a company to implement directly, and the document names no certification, audit or assessment scheme a business could be measured against.
Where a company does have a role, as one of the "non-military actors" the doctrine allows to collaborate alongside stability policing forces, or as a provider of the training, mentoring or capability-development work its annexes describe, what it can reasonably be asked to evidence is its own internal process: the procedures it follows, the training records for its people, and the documentation a contracting authority or customer audit expects to see. ComplyTrain is a quality and compliance platform for exactly that kind of internal record-keeping: controlled procedures, training records, corrective actions and the document trail that work generates, kept current and ready to produce.
What we do not do: we do not conduct stability policing operations, we do not confer or withdraw the executive police powers the doctrine describes, and we do not mentor, train or reform an indigenous police force ourselves. That work happens in the field, under a military chain of command, not in software. What applies to a specific contract, and which document actually binds a given supplier, is set by that contract and the customer's quality clause. The standards explorer shows what else sits in the catalogue alongside AJP-3.22, and we are glad to talk through what your contract actually requires.
Tell us how you need to work with AJP-3.22 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Not directly. AJP-3.22 is guidance for NATO commanders and staffs on planning and conducting stability policing; it never names a supplier, manufacturer or acquirer as its audience. A company's obligations come from the specific mandate, arrangement or contract that draws it in as one of the "non-military actors" the doctrine allows to collaborate, not from AJP-3.22 itself.
No. AJP-3.22 is the Allied Joint Publication, the doctrine itself. STANAG 2616 is the Standardization Agreement by which NATO nations record their agreement to use it. The STANAG is the cover; AJP-3.22 is what it covers.
Replacement applies when an indigenous police force is absent or non-existent, and NATO stability policing assets take on full executive police powers, including the use of force and the power of search and arrest. Reinforcing applies when an indigenous police force exists but needs support, and it keeps those executive powers itself while NATO assets provide monitoring, mentoring, advising, training and partnering.
No. AJP-3.22 has no certification, audit or accreditation scheme for a company to map a product against, and ComplyTrain makes no claim to implement or align with it. Where ComplyTrain helps is with the internal procedures, training records and audit trail a defence contract's own quality clause requires, whatever standard that clause names.
This page describes Edition A, Version 1, promulgated 14 July 2016 and effective upon receipt. The preface frames it as the first dedicated NATO doctrine for stability policing, filling a gap the earlier Security Force Assistance concept left open for local police forces, rather than as a revision of an earlier edition.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.