Start a free trial
Menu

AFAP-05

AFAP-05 heat release rate testing for materials

Suppliers, manufacturers and test laboratories asked to evaluate a material's heat release rate under a NATO defence contract

AFAP-5 is NATO's cone calorimeter test method for measuring a material's heat release rate, used to compare candidate materials during pre-selection for their fire characteristics.

Edition
3
Published
2010-07
Evaluated by
government-surveillance

What it is

AFAP-5 (Allied Fire Assessment Publication 5, Edition 3) is the NATO document that defines how to measure a material's heat release rate using a cone calorimeter. It is an implementation of ISO 5660-1, and it says so directly: the procedure "is an implementation of ISO 5660-1," supplemented with "detailed requirements for specimen preparation for particular types of material, additional details for test and calibration procedures... and requirements for data presentation." It cannot be used on its own - AFAP-5 states that "only the information that is additional to ISO 5660-1 is included in this document" and that it "must be read in conjunction with a copy of ISO 5660-1."

AFAP-5 is the fifth in a five-part series. AFAP-1 sets the policy for pre-selecting materials by their fire characteristics (and the irradiance level and Ship Type classifications the other four parts use); AFAP-2 covers smoke generation, AFAP-3 toxicity of fire effluents, AFAP-4 surface spread of flame, and AFAP-5 heat release rate. NATO nations' agreement to use the series is recorded in STANAG 4602. Edition 3 was promulgated in July 2010, is effective on receipt, and supersedes Edition 2.

Who runs the test, and why

The document addresses the test laboratory that operates the cone calorimeter, and the supplier and manufacturer whose material is submitted for evaluation - the test report has to name both, "the name and address of the supplier and where different, of the manufacturer (original source) of the material tested." It also defines a Technical Authority: "the relevant national authority, responsible for providing regulations and guidance on fire reaction of materials associated with procurement and in service support." The Technical Authority decides certain test parameters (which face of a laminated or asymmetrical product gets tested, for example) and is the point of contact for any question about how the publication applies to a tender or contract.

When it binds

AFAP-5 has force because nations have agreed to use it: "the agreement of interested nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 4602." That agreement reaches a supplier or laboratory through a tender or contract, not automatically - the preface says enquiries "in relation to an invitation to tender or a contract in which it is incorporated are to be addressed to the Technical Authority." Read plainly, that means AFAP-5 is something a laboratory or supplier is asked to test against because a specific contract requires it, at the point a material needs qualifying, rather than a standard to design a process around in advance of any contract.

Materials, and specimen preparation

The heat release rate test applies to whatever material a Technical Authority submits for evaluation. AFAP-5's annexes set out specific preparation methods for several material types:

  • Paint and coating systems, applied to 100 x 100 mm mild steel panels per the manufacturer's

instructions, cured, then conditioned for 7 days at (23 +/- 2) degC and (50 +/- 10)% relative humidity before testing within a further 7 days.

  • Tubes and pipes, cut into flat strips if the material is flexible, or curved strips sized to

fill a 100 mm specimen width if it is rigid.

  • Upholstered furniture and mattresses, tested as an assembled composite of every covering,

interliner and padding layer in the order and thickness they occur in the finished item (reduced proportionally above a 50 mm total). Component squares are cut and weighed to a 95-105% mass tolerance before assembly, and covers that have been chemically treated to reduce ignitability go through the water-soak and drying procedure from Annex E of BS 5852 first. That water-soak step is specific to AFAP-5: "water soak or washing procedures are only required for assessment of heat release rate in accordance with AFAP-5 and shall not be undertaken for tests according to AFAP-2 or AFAP-3."

A table in Annex 2 sets the required specimen form for each named material type, including interior deck coverings, thermal insulation and decorative linings.

Running the test

Three specimens are tested at the irradiance level AFAP-1 requires, 25 or 50 kW/m2. Where materials have faces that differ, "the Technical Authority shall determine which of the faces are required to be tested," and a result is only valid for the face actually tested. Materials that can decompose explosively when heated need a specimen holder secured strongly enough to contain the reaction. Data is scanned every 2 seconds or less, and the test runs until whichever comes first: 22 minutes after sustained flaming, 20 minutes with no ignition, the oxygen reading returning to its pre-test baseline for 10 minutes, or the specimen reaching zero mass, subject to a 5-minute minimum.

Beyond the standard ISO 5660-1 heat release rate calculation, AFAP-5 adds MARHE (the Maximum Average Rate of Heat Emission) and, for generic materials and Ship Type (H) upholstery work specifically, the 30-second sliding averages HRR30max and SPR30max. Smoke production measurement against ISO 5660-2 is optional generally, but becomes mandatory when evaluating furniture or components as "fire-restricting materials" for Ship Type (H).

What the test report has to contain

Clause 11 sets out a defined content list: laboratory and supplier/manufacturer identity, test dates, a detailed material description (composition, form, dimensions, coatings, NATO stock numbers, prior test history), a full ISO 5660-1 report, the individual and 3-specimen average MARHE or HRR30max/SPR30max figures, additional details such as which gas-sampling method was used and the heat flux meter's calibration traceability, and a mandated disclaimer that "these results relate only to the behaviour of the specimens of the material under the particular conditions of test."

How you are evaluated

AFAP-5 describes no certification scheme, and no accredited body or notified body appears anywhere in it. It is a laboratory test method: a test house runs it and produces a report, and the Technical Authority - the national authority for fire reaction, procurement and in-service support

  • sets certain parameters and uses the resulting figures for its own material decisions, optionally

feeding the Materials Fire Characteristics Data Sheets that STANAG 4602's database holds. That is a national authority directing and using a technical result, not a certification of a material or an organisation.

Standards it references

Clause 2 normatively references six documents. STANAG 4602 records the nations' agreement to use the AFAP series and is how AFAP-5 acquires contractual force. The remaining five are civil standards outside this catalogue: ISO 5660-1 is the base cone calorimeter method AFAP-5 supplements; ISO 5660-2 supplies the smoke-production measurement AFAP-5 references; ISO 291 sets the conditioning atmosphere used for test specimens; ISO 1514 is pointed to for surface preparation technique examples; and BS 5852 supplies the water-soak procedure used on treated upholstery covers. AFAP-5 also depends on AFAP-1 for the irradiance level and Ship Type classifications several of its clauses refer back to.

How we help

The work AFAP-5 demands is physical: running a calibrated cone calorimeter to a defined set of parameters and producing a report with the content clause 11 lists. That work happens in a laboratory, not in software, and ComplyTrain does not run the test, calibrate a heat flux meter, or decide which face of a material a Technical Authority requires tested.

What ComplyTrain supports is the documentation trail around that work: a controlled procedure for how candidate materials are selected and dispatched for AFAP-5 testing, so the right face, irradiance and Ship Type classification are requested and recorded; a held, version-controlled record of a heat flux meter's calibration chain and its traceability back to LNE or SP; a checklist matching clause 11's required report fields, so a supplier reviewing a laboratory's report back can see at a glance whether anything is missing; and training records for staff who prepare specimens against the Annex 1 procedures for paint systems, tubes and pipes, or upholstery composites.

Which tier of testing and which companion standards apply to a given programme is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by this page. The standards explorer shows what sits alongside AFAP-5 in the series and under STANAG 4602 - if a current contract raises a specific requirement, get in touch and we can talk through it.

Standards it references

Questions

Is ComplyTrain an AFAP-5 test laboratory?

No. AFAP-5 testing is physical laboratory work performed with a calibrated cone calorimeter. ComplyTrain is not a test house and does not run the test; it helps an organisation manage the documentation, calibration records and evidence trail around testing that a laboratory performs.

Does AFAP-5 replace ISO 5660-1?

No. AFAP-5 only contains what is additional to ISO 5660-1 and states explicitly that it "must be read in conjunction with a copy of ISO 5660-1." Where AFAP-5 gives no instruction, ISO 5660-1's own provisions apply.

Is AFAP-5 mandatory?

Only through a contract. NATO nations record their agreement to use the AFAP series in STANAG 4602, and it reaches a supplier or laboratory when a specific tender or contract incorporates it - there is no general answer independent of the contract in question.

What is the difference between AFAP-5 and the other AFAP publications?

AFAP-1 sets pre-selection policy and the irradiance/Ship Type parameters the others use; AFAP-2 covers smoke generation, AFAP-3 toxicity of fire effluents, AFAP-4 surface spread of flame, and AFAP-5 heat release rate. The document notes that AFAP-5's and AFAP-2's smoke results specifically "cannot be directly compared and may rank materials in a different order," since they use different apparatus and method.