Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AMedP-1.2
Navies of NATO nations equipping ship life rafts, lifeboats and rescue boats, and the suppliers of survival and first-aid kit procured against a naval contract
AMedP-1.2 is NATO's recommended minimum for medical and survival equipment on ship life rafts, lifeboats and rescue boats, binding navies through STANAG 1185 rather than a supplier directly.
AMedP-1.2 is NATO's Allied Medical Publication setting a recommended minimum for the medical and survival equipment carried on ship life rafts, lifeboats, combined life and rescue boats, and rescue boats operated by NATO navies. Its own stated aim is to standardise a minimum list of essential items for the first-aid medical equipment of these craft and to recommend a further list of items for survival and rescue, together with guidelines to be followed for survival at sea. Edition A, Version 3 was promulgated in January 2022 and supersedes Edition A, Version 2.
Chapter 1 defines "life raft," for the publication's own purposes, broadly enough to cover life boats, life rafts, combined life and rescue boats, and rescue boats, drawing the underlying terms from IMO's Life-Saving Appliance Code and the SOLAS Convention. AMedP-1.2 does not set out to replace those instruments: it adds a NATO-specific recommended minimum for equipment and survival guidance on top of the wider maritime safety framework those craft already sit inside.
AMedP-1.2 addresses NATO nations and, through them, the navies that operate and equip the ships in question. It does not name a manufacturer, contractor or notified body anywhere in its text. Where equipment is bought in rather than provisioned directly, the buyer and acceptor is the nation's own navy or its procurement authority, not AMedP-1.2 itself.
The publication binds through STANAG 1185: the letter of promulgation states that "the agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 1185." That is the mechanism common to Allied Publications generally - a STANAG records a nation's commitment, and the technical detail lives in the publication it covers - but AMedP-1.2's own operative clause is written as encouragement rather than an unqualified duty: participating nations are asked to utilise the guidance "in providing survival equipment for life rafts," and six nations recorded reservations against specific annexes or items at promulgation. For a commercial supplier, none of this creates an obligation on its own. The document reaches a company only when a naval contract, tender or national supply specification calls for equipment built to AMedP-1.2's categories, or to a national standard that draws on it.
Annex A sets out a table of recommended items for general survival and rescue, organised by which type of craft carries each. Annex B sets out a further table of minimum items for the first-aid outfit carried alongside it. AMedP-1.2 specifies items, and in Annex B's case quantities and reference codes, for both; this page does not reproduce that content. What matters for a reader assessing relevance is that two equipment tables exist and what each covers in general terms, not the itemised detail, which stays in the document itself.
Annexes C, D and E cover, respectively, preparing to abandon ship, the immediate actions to take on boarding a life raft, and guidance for surviving in a raft over time. These are operational and survival instructions addressed to a ship's crew at the point of an actual emergency at sea, not something a commercial supplier implements, and this page does not reproduce them.
Annex F names other documents that "should be considered whenever considering implementation of AMedP-1.2 in the multinational NATO environment": an IMO resolution and an ISO standard on survival equipment for survival craft and rescue boats. Both sit outside our catalogue; AMedP-1.2 does not make either binding on a reader, only relevant background to the same subject.
AMedP-1.2 names no certification, accreditation or notified-body scheme, and no organisation is assessed against it by a third party. A nation's own navy provisions its ships against the recommended list, and where it departs from part of it, that departure is recorded as a reservation at promulgation rather than found through an audit. Where a company supplies equipment into this chain, what it is actually assessed against is whatever the naval customer's own contract, specification or acceptance procedure sets out - not AMedP-1.2 directly, and never a certificate this document itself could confer.
AMedP-1.2 sets a recommended equipment minimum for NATO navies' own ships. The work it describes - provisioning a life raft's first-aid outfit and survival equipment, checking and restocking it, and briefing a crew on the guidance it carries - happens in shipboard and procurement practice, not in software, and this page will not stretch it into a product mapping that does not exist.
Where ComplyTrain's ordinary work applies is to the documentation trail around a naval supply contract that calls for equipment built to AMedP-1.2's categories, or to a national specification derived from it: holding the procedure that states which equipment category applies, logging delivery and acceptance checks against it, and keeping the evidence a naval customer or its procurement authority asks to see, including any national variation a contract carries forward from AMedP-1.2's own reservations. ComplyTrain does not manufacture, supply or physically inspect survival or medical equipment, does not decide what a life raft's outfit contains, and does not run the shipboard checks a navy performs on its own equipment.
What applies to a specific contract, and which other standards sit alongside AMedP-1.2, is set by the customer and the national specification in play, not by this page. The standards explorer shows the STANAGs and Allied Publications AMedP-1.2 sits next to, and we are glad to talk through what a specific naval contract actually asks a supplier to evidence.
Tell us how you need to work with AMedP-1.2 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds NATO nations through STANAG 1185, the agreement recording their commitment to use it, but its own guidance is worded as something participating nations are encouraged to utilise rather than an unqualified duty, and six nations recorded reservations against parts of it at promulgation. For a commercial supplier, it becomes a requirement only where a naval contract or national specification names it.
Yes, in the document itself: Annex A lists recommended survival and rescue items and Annex B lists minimum first-aid items, both organised by craft type. This page does not reproduce either list; it describes what the annexes cover so a reader can judge relevance, not the itemised contents.
No. AMedP-1.2 names no certification, accreditation or notified-body scheme for any organisation. A nation's own navy provisions its ships against the recommended list, and a supplier is assessed against whatever its naval customer's contract or specification sets out, not against a certificate this document could confer.
STANAG 1185 is the NATO agreement recording nations' commitment to use AMedP-1.2; AMedP-1.2 is the Allied Publication that carries the actual recommended equipment and survival guidance. The STANAG gives the publication its force; the technical content lives in AMedP-1.2 itself.
No. It addresses NATO navies and the ships they operate. Annex F points to IMO Resolution A.657(16) and ISO 18813 as the wider survival-equipment standards for survival craft and rescue boats generally, which sit alongside AMedP-1.2 rather than being replaced by it.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.