Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 2345
Defence contractors whose facilities or personnel work near equipment that produces electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields, under a contract that invokes STANAG 2345 or the IEEE C95.1-2345-2014 standard it covers
STANAG 2345 is NATO's ratified agreement committing member nations to protect military personnel from electric, magnetic and electromagnetic field exposure by implementing IEEE C95.1-2345-2014.
STANAG 2345 is the NATO Standardization Agreement covering personnel exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields in military workplaces, over the frequency range its own title states: 0 Hz to 300 GHz. This is Edition 4, promulgated 26 November 2015, superseding Edition 3.
Most STANAGs cover a NATO Allied Publication: an AQAP, an AEP, an AMedP. STANAG 2345 does something different. Participating nations agree to implement the following standard, and the standard it names is IEEE C95.1-2345-2014, a publication of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, obtained from IEEE on IEEE's own terms rather than through NATO. The STANAG itself sets out no exposure limits, reference levels or technical thresholds of its own; those live in IEEE C95.1-2345-2014, and anyone actually assessing a workplace against them needs that publication, not this cover agreement.
The stated aim is interoperability: to protect personnel engaged in NATO operations in military environments against established adverse health effects from exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields, induced and contact current, and contact and arcing voltages, for incorporation into a personnel protection safety program. A nation may implement the covered standard's environmental exposure levels individually or in full, but the text is explicit that consistent restrictions still apply once personnel from different nations are working together, to keep multinational activities interoperable.
STANAG 2345 binds nations, not companies. It becomes effective for a nation through ratification, tracked in the NATO Standardization Document Database (NSDD) separately from implementation: nations examine their own ratification and advise the NATO Standardization Office of their implementation intentions, and partner nations receive a standing invitation to adopt the STANAG rather than an obligation to ratify it. Nations and partner nations report their progress using dedicated annexes of AAP-03(J): Annex H for nations, Annex G for partner nations. A defence contractor meets STANAG 2345, or the standard it covers, only where a contract or a customer's own safety programme requires it; the document sets no obligation reaching a supplier directly.
STANAG 2345 describes no certification scheme and no audit of its own. What it describes is nations reporting their ratification and implementation status to NATO for the record. Where a facility's own field-exposure programme is checked in practice, the assessor and the evidence required come from the contract's quality clause or the customer's safety requirements, not from this STANAG.
STANAG 2345 covers IEEE C95.1-2345-2014, the civil publication that actually sets the exposure requirements. Its "Other Related Documents" list adds IEEE Std C95.7-2005 (a recommended practice for radio-frequency safety programs), STANAG 1379 (the NATO RADHAZ warning sign), STANAG 1380 (the NATO Naval Radio and Radar Radiation Hazards Manual, paired with AECP-02), STANAG 3680 (which covers AAP-06, NATO's glossary of terms and definitions), Council Directive 92/58/EEC on health and safety signs at work, and ISO 3864 on graphical safety symbols and colours - the last two naming the warning-sign side of the programme rather than the exposure requirements themselves. Separately, AAP-03 is named only as the publication carrying the national reporting-form annexes, not as a technical reference on field exposure.
STANAG 2345 and the IEEE C95.1-2345-2014 requirements it covers are followed in the day-to-day running of a facility, not in a compliance platform: a safety officer surveys workplaces for field sources, a facility controls and marks the areas that need it, and a safety or quality department keeps the survey, training and incident records that prove the personnel protection programme is actually working. This document matters most to a defence contractor whose facilities sit near equipment that produces electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields, such as radar or radio-frequency transmitting equipment - but STANAG 2345 itself binds the nations that ratify it, not the companies operating within their borders, and a contractor meets it only where a contract or a customer's safety programme requires it.
What ComplyTrain does for that kind of work generally is give a defence supplier one auditable place to hold the field-exposure survey records, the training records for personnel working near the relevant equipment, and the evidence trail - corrective actions, document control - that a customer's quality representative or a government surveillance visit will ask to see. ComplyTrain does not survey a workplace, measure field levels against IEEE C95.1-2345-2014, or determine whether a facility meets it. That is occupational health and safety work, carried out against the covered standard and the contract's own requirements, not something a piece of software can do on a supplier's behalf.
Which standards actually apply to a given facility or contract is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. Browse the explorer to see what sits alongside STANAG 2345, and talk to us about the evidence trail once you know which ones are in your contract.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 2345 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Only where a nation has ratified and implemented it, and it reaches a defence contractor only where a contract or tender requires it. STANAG 2345 binds nations, not companies, directly.
STANAG 2345 is NATO's ratification agreement; IEEE C95.1-2345-2014 is the civil IEEE publication that actually sets the exposure requirements nations agree to implement. STANAG 2345 does not restate those requirements itself.
No. The document describes nations ratifying and reporting their implementation to NATO, recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database. It names no certification, accreditation or audit scheme for a supplier or a facility.
No. Unlike most STANAGs, which cover a NATO Allied Publication such as an AQAP, AEP or AMedP, STANAG 2345 names a civil IEEE standard, IEEE C95.1-2345-2014, as the standard participating nations agree to implement.
The document states that this edition supersedes STANAG 2345 Edition 3, but it does not itself describe what changed between the two editions.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.