Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 2560
National authorities and NATO bodies evaluating the medical treatment capability a nation contributes to NATO operations
STANAG 2560 is NATO's agreement covering AMedP-1.6, AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8, the publications nations use to evaluate the medical capability of the units and facilities they contribute to NATO operations; it does not create a certificate a company can hold.
STANAG 2560, Edition 3, dated 8 July 2025, is a NATO Standardization Agreement. It is not a technical specification in its own right. It is the ratified agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement three Allied Medical Publications: AMedP-1.6, Edition B, the medical evaluation manual; AMedP-1.7, Edition A, the capability matrix; and AMedP-1.8, Edition A, the skills matrix. The evaluation content a reader usually wants, what an evaluation actually looks at, lives in those three publications, each with its own record, not inside this cover.
The STANAG states its aim as responding to a single interoperability requirement: "to facilitate and provide the framework for nations to certify their own medical capabilities and also for the medical evaluation of multinational medical modules and units, when formed to support NATO operations." Under "Agreement," participating nations "agree to implement the following standards": AMedP-1.6, Edition B; AMedP-1.7, Edition A; AMedP-1.8, Edition A.
The document is explicit about what the word "certification" means here: "Medical certification in the military field is the official recognition that a staff, module, unit or force component can provide the defined capability agreed by nations or, if it cannot, documents the residual risk and required mitigation." That recognition runs from a nation to the capability it contributes. Nowhere does the text name a supplier, manufacturer or contractor, and nothing in it creates a certificate that any organisation outside a national armed force could hold.
STANAG 2560 "is effective upon receipt for use by the participating nations and NATO bodies," once ratified. Ratification and implementation are separate steps: nations that have not already done so are invited to "advise the NSO of their intention regarding its ratification and implementation," and national responses are recorded in the NATO Standardization Documents Database. The STANAG "is implemented when NATO member states have issued direction to use the medical evaluation questionnaire, capability matrix and skills matrix as a guide when designing and conducting medical evaluations," and member states separately "agree to apply the general principles of medical evaluation outlined in the covered publications." The cover sets no NATO Effective Date of its own ("Not applicable"), so there is no single answer to when it takes effect beyond a given nation's own ratification and implementation.
Alongside the three publications it covers, the cover names related documents for context: MC 0326 on NATO principles and policies of medical support, MC 0458 on NATO education, training, exercises and evaluation policy, Bi-Strategic Command Directive 075-002 on education and training, and the Bi-Strategic Command capability codes and capability statements dated 26 October 2023. It also names STANAG 2182, which covers AJP-4; STANAG 2228, which covers AJP-4.10; STANAG 5064, which covers AAP-31; and STANAG 6023, which covers ATrainP-1. None of these bind this STANAG's own agreement; they are named as related reading. This edition "supersedes the following document: STANAG 2560, Edition 2, dated 28 January 2016," and reflects an updated AMedP-1.6, Edition B - the cover states "All other covered AMedPs remain unchanged and in effect." The STANAG "is to be reviewed in accordance with AAP-03."
STANAG 2560 itself gives nobody outside a national armed force something to implement directly: it is an agreement between nations, and the evaluation content sits in AMedP-1.6, AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8. There is no certification here for a company to seek, and this page will not tell you that there is.
Where an organisation supports a national medical capability, through training, logistics or quality documentation, the practical work looks like any other evidence trail: documented procedures for the tasks a contract assigns, training records showing people are current, and a clear corrective-action history an auditor or customer quality representative can follow. ComplyTrain's role in that kind of work is to hold it as controlled documents rather than scattered across email and shared drives, for whatever a specific role actually requires.
ComplyTrain does not perform or referee a medical evaluation, decide what capability a nation must contribute, or substitute for AMedP-1.6, AMedP-1.7 or AMedP-1.8. In defence, the tier that applies and the standards that travel with it are set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by this page. Our standards explorer shows what else sits alongside this cover, and we're glad to talk through what a specific role actually requires.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 2560 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds a nation once that nation has ratified and implemented it, not a company. The document names no supplier, manufacturer or contractor, and it reaches an organisation only through whatever role a specific arrangement gives it in supporting a national medical capability.
STANAG 2560 is the cover agreement: it commits nations to implement the three publications but contains no evaluation content itself. AMedP-1.6 is the medical evaluation manual, AMedP-1.7 is the capability matrix, and AMedP-1.8 is the skills matrix, each covered under its own edition and each with its own record.
No. The certification the document describes is "the official recognition that a staff, module, unit or force component can provide the defined capability agreed by nations" - a recognition a nation gives to the capability it contributes, never a certificate any organisation outside a national armed force can hold.
Edition 3, dated 8 July 2025, which supersedes Edition 2, dated 28 January 2016. This edition reflects an updated AMedP-1.6, Edition B; AMedP-1.7 and AMedP-1.8 keep the editions this cover prints.
The cover names them as related documents, not as agreements STANAG 2560 depends on: STANAG 2182 covers AJP-4, STANAG 2228 covers AJP-4.10, STANAG 5064 covers AAP-31, and STANAG 6023 covers ATrainP-1. They inform the context STANAG 2560 sits in rather than being required by it.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.