Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 4560
Manufacturers and test houses meeting an electro-explosive-device characterization requirement written into a customer contract
STANAG 4560 is the NATO agreement under which member nations commit to characterizing electro-explosive devices to AOP-43, implemented through each nation's own policy update.
STANAG 4560 is a NATO standardization agreement: a short document by which NATO nations commit to implementing a named Allied Publication, in this case AOP-43, electro-explosive devices, assessment and test methods for characterization. The STANAG itself carries none of the characterization methods. It states the interoperability aim, names the publication that carries the requirements, and sets out how nations ratify and implement it. This is Edition 4, promulgated by the NATO Standardization Office on 5 December 2025, and it supersedes STANAG 4560 Edition 3, dated 21 November 2016, bringing AOP-43 Edition D into force in place of AOP-43 Edition 3.
The stated aim is interoperability: NATO nations are asked to agree that they will "characterize Electro-Explosive Devices using the same test methods," keep results reproducible between test houses, and share data with each other. Participating nations then agree to implement "AOP-43, Edition D" as the standard that delivers that aim. The characterization methods themselves belong to AOP-43; this STANAG's role is to get nations to agree to use them consistently, not to describe them.
A STANAG binds a nation once it is ratified, and ratification and implementation are tracked separately here. National responses are recorded in the NATO Standardization Documents Database (NSDD), and nations are invited to examine their own ratification status and, where they have not already done so, tell the NATO Standardization Office their intentions. Implementation is a further step: a ratifying nation is considered to have implemented this STANAG once it has updated its national policy on electro-explosive-device characterization to incorporate the tests of AOP-43, and updated its national testing procedures and guidance to match. Allies and NATO bodies report their implementation details through the same electronic reporting tool; partner nations are invited to do the same. The cover sets no NATO-wide effective date of its own - "NATO Effective Date (NED): Not applicable" - so the date a supplier actually has to watch is the one in their own contract, not one this document starts.
The cover's own additional-information note says this edition updates the terminology used for electro-explosive-device characterization to align with NATO's standard vocabulary, and makes further changes to the characterization test regime. The detail of those changes is AOP-43's own content, not this cover's, so it belongs on that standard's own page rather than here.
The cover lists several related NATO documents without invoking any of them as binding requirements of this STANAG: AOP-43 itself, STANAG 4147 (AOP-4147) on chemical compatibility of energetic materials with munition components, STANAG 4157 (AOP-4157 and AOP-20) on safety, arming and functioning systems testing, STANAG 4170 (AOP-07) on qualifying explosive materials for military use, and STANAG 4370 (AECTP-100 and AECTP-600) on environmental testing. The STANAG's own review cycle runs under AAP-03.
STANAG 4560 itself gives a supplier nothing to implement directly: the agreement runs between nations, and the actual electro-explosive-device characterization work happens against AOP-43, in a test house, not in software. What a supplier or test house carries once a contract calls up this STANAG is the evidence trail around that work - the internal procedure describing how characterization is planned and executed, records of which activities were run and when, the AOP-43 edition those procedures were written against, and whatever a customer's quality representative asks to see. ComplyTrain gives a team a controlled place to hold those procedures, log completed characterization activities as records, keep them tied to the edition in force at the time, and track any corrective action a customer's audit raises. It does not perform electro-explosive-device characterization itself, and it holds none of AOP-43's test methods; that work stays in the lab.
Which tier of this family applies to a given programme, and whether STANAG 4560 or AOP-43 is named in your own contract, is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. See where STANAG 4560 sits alongside the standards it points to, or talk to us about the evidence trail your characterization programme needs to hold.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 4560 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Not on its own. The cover sets no NATO-wide effective date - it marks "NATO Effective Date (NED): Not applicable" - so the agreement reaches a supplier only once a ratifying nation has implemented it and a contract or tender calls up AOP-43-compliant characterization. Whether it applies to a given programme is a question for the contracting authority and the contract, not for the STANAG by itself.
STANAG 4560 is the agreement: the short cover in which NATO nations commit to implementing a named standard. AOP-43 is the Allied Publication that agreement brings into force, "AOP-43, Edition D" in this edition, and it is where the electro-explosive-device assessment and test methods themselves live.
This is Edition 4, promulgated 5 December 2025. It supersedes "STANAG 4560 Edition 3, dated 21 November 2016," and brings AOP-43 Edition D into force in place of AOP-43 Edition 3.
No. STANAG 4560 is ratified by nations, not companies, and the cover names no scheme for certifying an organisation. A supplier's characterization work is checked through a customer's own contract and quality clause, not through a certificate this STANAG creates.
NATO member nations. National responses are recorded in the NATO Standardization Documents Database, and "Allies and NATO bodies shall provide implementation details through the electronic reporting tool." A supplier does not ratify a STANAG; a nation does, and the STANAG reaches a supplier once that implementation is reflected in their own contract.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.