Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANREC 4792
NATO nations and NATO bodies negotiating or drafting a Memorandum of Understanding for an international co-operative armaments programme
STANREC 4792 is NATO's non-binding recommendation that nations use AACP-01 (Volume I, Edition B) when negotiating and drafting international co-operative armaments MOUs; adoption is voluntary, not required.
STANREC 4792 is a NATO Standardization Recommendation, Edition 1, dated 27 February 2017. A STANREC is built the same way a STANAG is, with one difference that matters: a STANAG is an agreement nations ratify, a STANREC is a recommendation they are free to take up. The document says so directly - it "is a non-binding document employed on a voluntary basis and does not require commitment of the nations to implement the standards which are listed in it."
STANREC 4792 carries no negotiating rules of its own. Its aim, in its own words, is "to list recommended practices regarding: the development, drafting and negotiation of arrangements for armaments cooperation among nations" - in practice, the process behind a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or a Programme MOU for an international co-operative armaments programme. The one thing it recommends is a single document: "AACP-01, Volume I, Edition B." It also names AAP-20, the NATO Programme Management Framework (NATO Life Cycle Model), as related reading rather than an additional obligation. The catalogue's own NSDD structure also records this STANREC as covering MACP-01, though the document itself never names MACP-01.
The tasking authority is the CNAD Life Cycle Management Group (AC/327); the custodian named in the document is the Netherlands (Mr Henk Visser). The STANREC "is to be reviewed at least once every three years," with the result "recorded within the NSDD," and "Nations and NATO bodies may propose changes, at any time, through a standardization proposal to the tasking authority (TA), where the changes will be processed during the review of the STANREC." This is the first edition: "This STANREC does not supersede any document."
STANREC 4792 addresses nations and NATO bodies negotiating a co-operative programme, not a supplier or manufacturer directly. It binds nobody by itself: whatever an organisation ends up doing follows from the MOU a nation actually negotiates, or from a programme office separately choosing to follow AACP-01's practice, not from this recommendation existing. It is a NATO non classified document, free of charge, handled under C-M(2002)60, and its reproduction restriction is lifted for member or partner nations and NATO commands and bodies.
STANREC 4792 names no certification body, no government quality assurance arrangement, no notified body, and no self-declaration scheme. The only assessment it describes is aimed at the document itself - the periodic review above - not at an organisation, a product, or a negotiation practice. Whatever review a company's involvement in a co-operative arrangement actually gets is set by whichever nation or programme office requires AACP-01 on a given programme, and that review sits outside this STANREC entirely.
STANREC 4792 is a cover document for a negotiation process, not a technical or quality-management standard: the practice it points to, AACP-01, governs how nations develop, draft and negotiate an armaments co-operation arrangement, and that work happens in a negotiation room and a programme or legal office, not inside a compliance tool. What ComplyTrain supports is the documentation trail that kind of work still needs: the internal procedure describing how a co-operative arrangement proposal is drafted, reviewed and approved before negotiation begins; training records showing the people involved were briefed on the organisation's own process; and the audit trail of internal reviews, approvals and changes made before a nation signs.
ComplyTrain does not negotiate on an organisation's behalf, does not draft or approve the legal terms of an MOU, and does not decide co-operative programme strategy - that is government to government negotiation and legal work. The applicable requirement on any given programme is set by the nations involved, not by us - explore the related standards this STANREC sits alongside, or talk to us about the documentation an internal approval process needs to hold up under review.
Tell us how you need to work with STANREC 4792 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. It is a recommendation, not an agreement nations ratify. The document states that it "is a non-binding document employed on a voluntary basis and does not require commitment of the nations to implement the standards which are listed in it." Any obligation a nation or company meets comes from the MOU itself or from a programme office that separately follows AACP-01, not from the STANREC.
A STANAG is an agreement NATO nations ratify, with reservations possible on implementation. A STANREC recommends a practice without asking for that commitment. STANREC 4792 recommends AACP-01; it does not ratify it.
One document: "AACP-01, Volume I, Edition B," for developing, drafting and negotiating international co-operative armaments arrangements such as MOUs and Programme MOUs. It also points to AAP-20, the NATO Programme Management Framework, as further reading.
No certification, government surveillance, or notified-body scheme is named in the document. The only review it describes is of the STANREC's own currency, at least once every three years, not an assessment of an organisation, a product, or a negotiation.
No. NATO standardization documents are free of charge; STANREC 4792 is not sold by NATO or by us.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
A 90-day plan for the smallest defence suppliers: let the tender set your scope, document what you already do, fix the security basics primes check, and keep the system small enough for two people to maintain.
Learn how to qualify, approve and monitor sub-suppliers, flow down requirements through purchase orders, and keep the records an auditor will ask to see under ISO 9001 clause 8.4 and AQAP.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.