Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AGeoP-19
National hydrographic and defence geospatial organisations that produce or receive NATO's Additional Military Layers data
AGeoP-19 defines Additional Military Layers, NATO's digital geospatial data products for non-navigational maritime defence use, covered by STANAG 7170 and mandated for WECDIS under STANAG 4564.
AGeoP-19 is the NATO Allied Geographic Publication that defines Additional Military Layers (AML), described in the document itself as "a unified range of digital geospatial data products designed to satisfy the totality of NATO non-navigational maritime defence requirements" (1.2). It is a product-family specification and governance document, not a management-system standard: it describes what each AML product contains, how it is built and encoded, and who governs it, rather than setting quality-assurance requirements an auditor checks. AML supplements standard navigational charts such as ENC and DNC with additional vector and gridded data, built to give "the defence maritime user" the information to support situational awareness "at every operating level from strategic planning to tactical operation" (1.2), and to be deployable across systems from headquarters planning through to navigational, weapon and sensor systems.
Edition B, version 1 was promulgated in February 2022, effective on receipt, and supersedes Edition A, version 1, which nations are to destroy under their own procedures. It reaches NATO nations through STANAG 7170: "the agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 7170" (Letter of Promulgation). As with any STANAG-covered Allied Publication, this is a national ratification rather than an obligation on a private-sector supplier by default; a national hydrographic or defence geospatial organisation, or a contractor building a system for one, meets it because a contract, tender or WECDIS interoperability requirement calls for it.
AGeoP-19 does not carry the detailed content specification itself. That lives in the separately maintained AML Product Specifications, hosted on the UK Hydrographic Office's AML web page, which the document calls "the authority for AML products" (1.5) and which "must be referred and adhered to by any AML production or receiving system" (1.5). AGeoP-19 describes the product family around them: six vector layers from the original 2001 specification, Contour Line Bathymetry (depth data denser than a standard chart), Large and Small Bottom Objects (seabed contacts above and below 5 metres respectively), Environment, Seabed and Beach (sediment, slope and beach data for mine-countermeasure and amphibious planning), Routes, Areas and Limits (territorial waters, practice areas, transit lanes) and Maritime Foundation and Facilities (coastline, ports, lights, pipelines and other background features); plus three gridded layers added between 2004 and 2006, Integrated Water Column and Atmospheric and Meteorological Climatology, and the still-draft Gridded Sediment product, which the document flags plainly as "not endorsed by NATO however it is used by some nations" (1.6). Version 3.0, published in 2008, folded the six vector specifications into one and extended their content with land, ice and air features and additional attribution.
Every AML product uses the WGS84 horizontal datum, and the only NATO-endorsed exchange format for the vector layers is IHO S-57, with gridded products delivered in netCDF or GRIB. The specification is deliberately split into a content part and separate format annexes, to keep the data's meaning stable while allowing flexibility in how it is encoded. Two requirements are easy to miss: "in the interests of international interoperability, AML products will not be encrypted" (1.11), unlike the S-63 scheme used for navigational ENC data, and the terms "Additional Military Layers" and "AML" are reserved exclusively for the concept and products this publication identifies (1.2), so the labels cannot be reused loosely.
Versions 1.0, 2.1 and 3.0 of the vector specification remain concurrently current because, in the document's own words, "the version of AML a NATO nation chooses to adopt will be dictated by the capability of their AML receiving systems and the requirements for interoperability across warfare disciplines and between NATO nations and NATO commands" (1.9). That choice genuinely varies: the recorded national reservations show Estonia still working toward producing some layers depending on data availability, Lithuania using only what it has already developed with no near-term plans to extend, Romania holding the equipment to compile six vector products but lacking WECDIS-equipped warships to use them, and the United States not participating in AML co-production at all while it transitions its own charting production toward the S-57-based standard AML depends on.
AML is "recognised as a core requirement for NATO maritime geospatial requirements" (1.10) and is "a mandated product for WECDIS as defined in STANAG 4564" (1.10), the shipboard electronic charting system used across NATO navies, and is supported through the multinational NATO AML Co-Production Programme. Development is directed by the Geospatial Maritime Working Group, which reports annually to the NATO Geospatial Board and is directed and supported for standardization work by the Joint Geospatial Standards Working Group. A next generation, AML+, built on the IHO S-500 series within the wider Defence Maritime Geospatial Exchange Model that STANAG 6503 outlines, is already in development; the document notes that STANAG 6503 will, "in due course," supersede STANAG 7170 (1.13), meaning the agreement that currently carries AGeoP-19 is itself expected to be replaced as that work matures. Separately, a planned Network Model Bathymetry specification was never completed; the document points implementers to the IHO S-102 Product Specification instead (1.12).
AGeoP-19 is carried by STANAG 7170, the NATO Standardization Agreement recording nations' agreement to use it. Within the text it also names APP-06, used together with IHO S-52 as the basis for the AML Portrayal Specification's display symbology; STANAG 4564, which defines WECDIS and mandates AML for it; and STANAG 6503, which outlines the Defence Maritime Geospatial Exchange Model that AGeoP-19's planned successor, AML+, is being built within. It also notes that the AML Large Bottom Object layer historically superseded former STANAG 3715, a document outside our catalogue, and names several IHO publications the format builds on or is moving toward, S-57, S-52, S-100, S-102 and the emerging S-500 series, which likewise sit outside the NATO catalogue.
AGeoP-19 is an operational and technical specification, not a management-system standard: compiling bathymetry and seabed data, building or configuring a WECDIS-compatible receiving system, and choosing which AML version to support are geospatial and systems-engineering tasks carried out by hydrographic and defence technical staff. ComplyTrain does not compile geospatial data, build S-57 encodings or operate a WECDIS terminal.
What ComplyTrain can hold is the record around that work: which AML version a given system or programme is built to, and why, as a controlled decision with an owner and a version history; training records for staff handling AML compilation or WECDIS geospatial data under STANAG 4564; and a nation's or programme's current reservation position, tracked as a living statement of what it can and cannot yet produce or receive, alongside any corrective action tied to closing a gap.
What ComplyTrain does not do: it does not decide which AML version applies, validate an S-57 encoding, or determine whether a system meets STANAG 4564's WECDIS requirements. The applicable tier, and the standards that come with it, is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause. See what sits alongside AGeoP-19, including STANAG 7170 and the WECDIS requirements in STANAG 4564, in the standards explorer, and talk to us about the evidence trail around a geospatial data programme.
Tell us how you need to work with AGeoP-19 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. AGeoP-19 describes the AML concept, its governance and its versions. The detailed content specifications that define each product's data fields are held and endorsed separately, currently hosted on the UK Hydrographic Office's AML web page, and are what a production or receiving system must actually follow.
It reaches NATO nations through STANAG 7170, the agreement recording their commitment to use it, and Additional Military Layers are specifically mandated for WECDIS under STANAG 4564. Whether it applies to a given contract or system depends on the tender or contract that invokes it, not on the publication existing on its own.
Versions 1.0, 2.1 and 3.0 of the vector specification remain concurrently current because nations' receiving systems vary in capability, and each nation adopts the version its own systems and interoperability needs require rather than moving to the newest version on a fixed schedule.
No. AGeoP-19 states plainly that AML products will not be encrypted, a deliberate choice made in the interests of international interoperability, distinct from the S-63 encryption scheme used for navigational ENC data.
AML+ is the next generation of the specification, built on the IHO S-500 series within the wider Defence Maritime Geospatial Exchange Model. It is still in development, and the document notes that STANAG 6503, which outlines that framework, will in due course supersede STANAG 7170, the agreement AGeoP-19 currently sits under.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.