Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AMedP-1.14
A vehicle converter or national authority specifying, building or accepting a military motor ambulance against a NATO nation's contract or national requirement
AMedP-1.14 sets NATO's minimum medical design requirements for military motor ambulances, sorting them into four capability types and stating what each type's medical compartment must provide.
AMedP-1.14 is the NATO Allied Medical Publication that gives nations a shared way to categorise military motor ambulances by medical capability, and sets the minimum requirements a motor ambulance's medical compartment must meet for each category. Edition B, Version 1 was promulgated in January 2025, effective on receipt, and supersedes Edition A, Version 1. Nations record their agreement to use it through STANAG 2872, the agreement that gives the publication its force.
The document's own scope is narrow, and it says so directly: it "concerns the medical design requirements only and does not address details of non-clinical vehicle requirements" beyond the minimum requirements for the medical compartment. General vehicle characteristics, crew safety, cross-terrain mobility and armour protection, are left to whichever NATO standards on those subjects apply, and this AMedP explicitly does not restrict a nation from mandating further equipment of its own. It also puts CBRN evacuation planning and the training or medical education of ambulance crews outside its scope, pointing both elsewhere.
Chapter 3 defines a "motor ambulance", wheeled or tracked, not rail, and sorts military motor ambulances into four types by medical capability rather than by chassis: a transport ambulance for patients not expected to become emergency cases, a multifunction ambulance combining primary health care and MEDEVAC, an emergency ambulance for the full range of trauma and other medical emergencies, and a mobile intensive care ambulance able to sustain in-transit care for the most dependent patients. The document draws these four category definitions from the civil standard EN 1789:2020, Medical vehicles and their equipment - Road ambulances, which it also lists among its references. It does not state that meeting AMedP-1.14 satisfies EN 1789:2020, or the reverse.
Annex A is where the minimum requirements themselves live, set out as a table against the four ambulance types. It covers the patient compartment's interior layout and stretcher handling, internal and external communication, temperature control, lighting, noise, electrical power, on-board storage, and a defined range of medical equipment, with capability rising from Type A through Type D. For several items, notably fixed medical gas supply and its servicing, medical tubing and connectors, suction equipment and ventilators, the annex points to a separate STANAG the item itself has to comply with, rather than fixing that technical detail in this document. This page names what Annex A covers rather than reproducing its table; a build against a specific ambulance type should be checked against the annex itself.
At this edition's promulgation, Belgium, Canada and Finland each recorded a reservation, covering where a piece of equipment sits within the vehicle, the scope of practice for personnel using a ventilator, and a capability that is only partially fielded pending procurement. The letter of promulgation notes this list may not be the complete current one, and points to the NATO Standardization Documents Database for it.
AMedP-1.14 is a technical design standard for a physical vehicle, not a management-system standard, so meeting it is design and procurement work, not something a piece of software does. What does look like familiar compliance work is the paperwork around that build: a record of which ambulance type a given vehicle is built to, the equipment fit-out drawn up against Annex A for that type, evidence that the gas cylinder, tubing, connector, suction and ventilator items on board separately comply with the STANAGs Annex A cites for them, and a record of any national reservation or added national requirement a customer has layered on top of the minimum. ComplyTrain holds that kind of evidence, procedures, controlled documents, equipment records and audit findings, as a controlled, auditable trail, so a vehicle converter or defence supplier has a clear record of what was built, to which category, and against which referenced standards, for whoever accepts the vehicle.
ComplyTrain does not design an ambulance, select or certify its medical equipment, or decide which of the four categories a given contract requires; that is set by the operational requirement, the contracting nation, and whatever national requirements a customer adds. The applicable category and the standards that come with it are matters for the contract and the customer's quality clause. The standards explorer shows the other Allied Publications and STANAGs in the medical family, and we are glad to talk through how you would document a build against this kind of requirement.
Tell us how you need to work with AMedP-1.14 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds NATO nations through STANAG 2872, the agreement recording their commitment to use it, and a nation can add further requirements of its own on top of its minimum. It reaches a vehicle converter or supplier once a contract, tender or national procurement requirement invokes the categorisation or the Annex A minimum requirements, not as a standing obligation on a commercial supplier by itself.
No. The document names no certification scheme, accredited body or notified body that assesses a vehicle against it. The nearest thing it describes is a nation recording a reservation against a requirement at the edition's promulgation; how a specific vehicle gets accepted is left to whatever a contract or national procurement process specifies.
AMedP-1.14 draws its four ambulance-type definitions, Type A through Type D, from the civil standard EN 1789:2020, and lists it among its references. It does not state that meeting AMedP-1.14 satisfies EN 1789:2020, or that meeting EN 1789:2020 satisfies AMedP-1.14.
No. This edition explicitly excludes CBRN requirements from its scope, since it addresses minimum medical requirements only, and points medical planning for evacuating CBRN patients to other NATO standards instead.
The current edition's summary of changes records a new title, a revised and relocated reference list, updated chapter numbering and content, a revised Annex A table, and the removal of the previous Annexes B and C, replaced with references to the supporting standards that now cover that ground.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.