Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
AMSP-05
M&S support planners and CAX teams designing and delivering modelling and simulation support to NATO training exercises
AMSP-05 is a NATO handbook that guides M&S support planners through applying modelling and simulation to plan and design NATO training exercises and computer-assisted exercises.
AMSP-05 is the Allied Modelling and Simulation Publication that guides how Modelling and Simulation (M&S) is planned and applied to support NATO training and exercises. It is written "from the perspective of the provider of M&S support" and builds on two existing frameworks rather than inventing its own: IEEE 1730's Distributed Simulation Engineering and Execution Process (DSEEP), and the NATO exercise process set out in Bi-SC Directive 75-3. It is a handbook for the people planning and running the M&S side of an exercise, not a requirement placed on a supplier or a nation. It reaches nations through STANREC 4801, and a STANREC is a NATO recommendation rather than a ratified STANAG: "the recommendation of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANREC 4801," so nations are invited to use it, not committed to it by agreement. Edition B, Version 1 was promulgated in November 2024 and is effective on receipt, superseding Edition A, Version 1 ("NATO Handbook (Best Practice) for Computer Assisted Exercises (CAX)"), which nations are to destroy under their own local procedures. It is a major revision prepared by the MSG-216 Research Task Group on behalf of the NATO Modelling and Simulation Group (NMSG) and its Modelling and Simulation Standards Subgroup (MS3).
AMSP-05 names no supplier obligation and sets no contract-clause language. Instead it addresses the roles inside an M&S or Computer-Assisted Exercise (CAX) support effort: the CAX Planner, who carries the responsibility "to capture requirements and together with the CAX Developer Lead perform the first step of a CAX analysis"; the CAX Development Lead, who is tasked to "develop and integrate technical solutions for M&S and implement the CAX database"; and, once the exercise is running, the CAX Manager, CAX Control and the CAX Operator, who "implements orders in simulation on behalf of RC and provides the output from the simulation back to RC." Annex A is addressed directly to "Aspiring M&S Support Planners," treating the handbook as the starting point for a career path rather than a compliance obligation. It applies to NATO and partner nations' collective training and exercises of any type that use synthetic representation, and the guidance "can directly be applied" to Distributed Synthetic Training as well as to conventional Computer-Assisted Exercises.
Bi-SC 75-3's Exercise Process runs four stages, and AMSP-05's guidance is fitted onto them rather than describing a separate process. Stage 0 (Initiation) sets the exercise's ambition and resources; Stage 1 (Specification) produces the EXSPEC, defining Exercise Aims and Objectives; Stage 2 (Planning) produces the EXPLAN and six Scenario Modules, from the geostrategic situation through to execution information at the start of the exercise; and Stage 3 (Conduct) is where the exercise actually runs, covered by the Exercise Control organisation and the Officer Conducting the Exercise's reporting. The EXPLAN itself is worth noting for what it excludes: written for those planning and running the exercise rather than the Training Audience (TA), it "is not designed or intended for use by the TA in their operational role," so operational information stays out of it apart from the exercise's own command-and-control structure and the timeline of scenario deliverables.
Chapter 3 sets out DSEEP's seven steps: define objectives, perform conceptual analysis, design the simulation environment, develop it, integrate and test it, execute it, then analyse and evaluate the results. Effort is not spread evenly across them - "the time and effort spent for each DSEEP step and activity varies depending on the need for change in existing M&S capabilities" - and the steps can overlap: development work on a well-understood part of the design can start "while other parts are still being designed." STANAG 4603 separately lists IEEE 1730 as NATO's process for simulation engineering and execution.
This edition's own guidance, however, only goes so far. As the document states, "this version of AMSP-05 focus on the three (3) first steps of DSEEP to understand requirements and design a matching CAX solution." Step 1 produces a Needs Statement, an Objectives Statement and Initial Planning Documents, ideally expressed as architecture views a non-technical audience can read. Step 2 produces the scenario, a conceptual model, and the simulation environment's requirements and test criteria. Step 3 selects member applications, sets federation agreements, and produces a detailed development and execution plan. Each of these iterates through the exercise's own planning conferences - drafted for the Exercise Specification Conference, refined across successive Exercise Group meetings, and reaching a form with only minor updates expected at the Main Planning Conference - with the M&S Annex M of the EXPLAN as the running deliverable. Steps 4 through 7, developing, integrating, testing, executing and evaluating the simulation environment, are only touched on at a table-of-activities level here; the detail is left to IEEE 1730 itself and to practical experience.
Chapter 4 uses the NATO Architecture Framework (NAF) to structure the M&S-specific building blocks that a companion publication, AMSP-03, defines: AMSP-03 "provides an architectural approach for designing, developing and implementing distributed synthetic training environments." NAF gives a common way to organise, present and compare architectures across different viewpoints, and to align with civil frameworks from bodies such as ISO, IEEE, The Open Group and OMG - useful when an M&S solution needs describing to both a NATO command and outside technical reviewers.
There is no certification, accreditation or third-party assessment attached to AMSP-05: it names no body that awards one and describes no pass/fail scheme. The closest thing to a check is the exercise's own planning conferences. At the Initial Planning Conference the CAX Planner presents the current iteration of the objectives, needs and conceptual model to the wider exercise audience; at the Main Planning Conference the design is presented for confirmation, with only minor changes expected from that point on. That is a review by the exercise's own commands and syndicates against the exercise's stated needs, not a government or accredited-body audit of a supplier.
AMSP-05 is carried by STANREC 4801, the NATO recommendation under which nations are invited to use it. It informs, and is informed by, AMSP-03, the source of the architectural building blocks this handbook's NAF-based guidance draws on, and it notes that STANAG 4603 lists IEEE 1730 as NATO's simulation engineering and execution process. Outside our catalogue, the whole handbook is built on IEEE 1730-2022 (DSEEP) and is fitted onto NATO Bi-SC Directive 075-003 (the Collective Training and Exercise Directive); it also cites NATO Architecture Framework Version 4.0, the NATO Terminology Database, AC/323-N(2021)0015 on Distributed Synthetic Training, and MC 0458/3, NATO's Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation policy.
Planning M&S support for a NATO exercise is engineering and coordination work - capturing needs and objectives, designing a CAX or simulation solution, taking it through Initial and Main Planning Conference review, and running it during the exercise. None of that is something a compliance platform performs, and AMSP-05 does not describe a system to implement, only a method for the CAX Planner and Development Lead to apply.
What ComplyTrain supports is the record around that method: the Needs Statement, Objectives Statement and Initial Planning Documents each DSEEP step produces, the M&S Annex M of the EXPLAN as it moves from its Exercise Specification Conference draft through to the version confirmed at the Main Planning Conference, and training records for people who have completed the reading and courses Annex A recommends, such as the Exercise Planning course at NATO School Oberammergau.
What ComplyTrain does not do: it does not design a simulation environment, select member applications, or run a CAX during an exercise. Which M&S publications a given exercise or programme invokes, and to what depth, is set by the exercise directive and the customer's own requirements. See what sits alongside AMSP-05 in the standards explorer, and talk to us about the documentation trail behind an M&S support effort.
Tell us how you need to work with AMSP-05 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. It reaches nations through STANREC 4801, a NATO recommendation rather than a ratified STANAG, so nations are invited to use it rather than committed to it by agreement. Whether a specific exercise or programme follows it depends on that exercise's own arrangements, not a blanket rule in the document.
AMSP-03 supplies the architectural approach for designing and implementing distributed synthetic training environments, using NATO Architecture Framework building blocks. AMSP-05 is the practical handbook for applying modelling and simulation to a specific training exercise, using AMSP-03's architectural approach and IEEE 1730's DSEEP process to do it.
This edition's own guidance in Annex B covers only the first three of DSEEP's seven steps: defining simulation environment objectives, conceptual analysis, and designing the simulation environment. The later steps, developing, integrating, testing, executing and evaluating the environment, are left to the IEEE 1730 standard itself.
No. AMSP-05 describes itself as a practical guide and names no accredited body, notified body or audit scheme. The nearest thing to a check is the review an M&S design goes through at an exercise's own planning conferences, not a certification of an organisation.
A CAX is a synthetic exercise that generates, moves and manages forces in a simulation environment based on commands from exercise participants, giving the Training Audience a realistic environment in which to reach its training objectives without the cost of moving real forces. AMSP-05 is written specifically for the people who plan and run that simulation, distinct from Bi-SC 75-3, which governs the wider exercise the CAX supports.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.