Start a free trial
Menu

ANEP-88

ANEP-88 coefficient of friction on flight decks

Naval authorities and ship maintenance organisations in NATO nations responsible for measuring and maintaining flight deck coefficient of friction, under the agreement recorded in STANAG 1278

ANEP-88 sets NATO's minimum coefficient of friction for ship flight deck coatings, and the manual and electronic methods used to measure it, binding nations through the agreement recorded in STANAG 1278.

Edition
A
Published
2017-06
THIS DOCUMENT Agreement Holds requirements Organisation certificate Product or design assessed ALLIED NAVAL ENGINEERING PUBLICATION · EDITION A · 2017-06 ANEP-88 Standard for the required level and measurement of coefficient of ANEP-88 sets NATO's minimum coefficient of friction (0.6) for ship flight deck coatings and the Bedford Pad and Slip-Stop FSC 2000 methods used to measure it, binding nations throu. AGREEMENT STANAG 1278 The agreement that puts this publication into force. WHERE THE REQUIREMENTS LIVE ANEP-88 ANEP-88 sets NATO's minimum coefficient of friction (0.6) for ship flight deck coatings and the Bedford Pad and Slip-Stop FSC 2000 methods used to measure it, binding nations throu. A supplier meets ANEP-88 when a contract or national instruction names it, usually via STANAG 1278. Addressed to national authority. Covered by STANAG 1278. ANEP-88 sets a minimum coefficient of friction and two measurement methods to check it. Reaches a supplier when a contract, tender or national instruction names it. Nobody is certified against this document. Nations report ratification; they do not issue a company certificate.

What it is

ANEP-88 is a NATO Allied Procedural Publication that sets the minimum coefficient of friction (CoF) a ship's flight deck coating must maintain, and specifies how to measure it. Its aim is "to establish the minimum standard requirements of Coefficient of Friction (CoF) of ships' flight decks in order to reduce the possibility of aircraft slipping" (clause 0101). It now carries the textual and procedural content that used to sit directly inside STANAG 1278: STANAG 1278 Edition 2, with that content removed, is the covering standard, and ANEP-88 is a direct replacement for the preceding edition.

There is one pass/fail figure in the document. Participating nations agree to "Maintain a minimum CoF of the flight deck coating of 0.6" and to adopt the methods of inspection and measurement the publication sets out (clause 0102, Agreement). Everything else in ANEP-88 is the detail of how that figure is obtained.

Method and occasions of inspection

Dynamic measurements are taken "with a measuring device in the vicinity of the landing spot(s) and also in random areas wherever aircraft are liable to be traversed or parked," always when the flight deck is dry (clause 0102, Details of the Agreement). Measurement is triggered three ways rather than on a fixed calendar cycle: after the flight deck coating is first applied, after it is re-applied during maintenance periods, and when doubt exists about the effectiveness of the coating's anti-slip properties. Deck coatings themselves are additionally maintained to national standards or a referenced national specification; ANEP-88 does not specify a coating product or how it is applied.

The Bedford Pad (Annex A)

The manually operated method uses a 150 x 150 mm metal block, with a section of rubber aircraft tyre (Shore hardness A 50, 5 mm thick, chamfered edges) bonded to its underside; the whole assembly weighs 2.5 kg. The operator connects a spring balance and pulls the device athwartship, then fore-and-aft, keeping the balance parallel to the deck. The CoF is the sum of the two readings divided by twice the block's weight.

The Slip-Stop FSC 2000 (Annex B)

The electronic method uses a motor-driven glider under a fixed 24 N downward force, dragged along the deck while an internal potentiometer measures the drag force needed to sustain it. The operator runs a 60 cm test, notes the maximum CoF from a printed record, repeats it for an average maximum, then repeats the whole sequence on four more areas of deck to get an average maximum CoF across five areas. The instrument itself weighs 7.5 kg, takes four interchangeable glider types (leather, rubber, plastic, uncoated), measures with a DMS sensor rated to 2% accuracy, offers wet or dry measurement modes, and prints date, time, glider type and the min/max/average values (Annex B, Table 1).

Who it binds, and how

ANEP-88 addresses "Participating nations" directly (clause 0102, Agreement); it names no company, manufacturer or supplier. The agreement to use it is recorded in STANAG 1278, so a nation's naval authority is bound once that nation has ratified STANAG 1278, and the document reaches a shipyard, a coatings supplier or a maintenance contractor only when a naval contract or that national authority invokes it, not because NATO printed the document. Edition A, Version 1 was promulgated June 2017 and is "effective upon receipt."

How it is evaluated

ANEP-88 names no certification body, notified body, test house or government surveillance role, and describes no audit or accreditation scheme. What exists is the 0.6 minimum CoF and the two measurement methods used to obtain a reading against it; the document does not say who reviews a reading or how it is retained, beyond the Slip-Stop FSC 2000's own printed record.

Getting the document

NATO publishes ANEP-88 through the NATO Standardization Document Database at no charge. ComplyTrain does not sell it or host a copy; the NSDD listing for ANEP-88 is the source. It is covered by STANAG 1278, the agreement recording nations' commitment to use it.

Put ANEP-88 on a system that keeps the evidence

Documents, training, risks and evidence in one place, with the trail an auditor asks for.

How we help

ANEP-88 is a technical measurement standard, not a management system to implement in software. The work it demands, applying a compliant deck coating, running the Bedford Pad or the Slip-Stop FSC 2000 method, and reading a CoF figure off a spring balance or a printout, is naval maintenance and inspection work carried out on the ship, not something a compliance platform performs.

What ComplyTrain supports is the record-keeping around that work: holding the procedure that fixes when and how a CoF measurement is taken, the training record for whoever runs the Bedford Pad or the Slip-Stop FSC 2000, and the dated measurement results, including the instrument's own printout, as evidence that the 0.6 minimum was checked at the occasions ANEP-88 lists.

What ComplyTrain does not do: it does not apply or test the deck coating, it does not operate the measuring instruments, and it does not decide whether a given CoF reading passes. See where ANEP-88 sits alongside STANAG 1278 and other maritime publications in the standards explorer, and talk to us about the record trail behind flight deck coating inspections.

Standards it references

Request access to this standard

Tell us how you need to work with ANEP-88 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.

Questions

Is ANEP-88 mandatory?

Not by itself. ANEP-88 is covered by STANAG 1278, the agreement recording nations' commitment to use it. Whether it applies to a specific ship or a maintenance programme depends on whether the operating nation has taken on that agreement and a contract or national authority invokes it.

What is the minimum coefficient of friction ANEP-88 requires?

0.6. Participating nations agree to maintain a minimum CoF of 0.6 on the flight deck coating (clause 0102, Agreement); the document gives no other threshold.

What is the difference between the Bedford Pad and the Slip-Stop FSC 2000?

The Bedford Pad is a manually operated device: a weighted rubber-faced block pulled by hand with a spring balance in two directions to give a single CoF reading. The Slip-Stop FSC 2000 is an electronic, motor-driven meter that runs a 60 cm test and prints the maximum CoF over that run, correlated against the Bedford Pad method (Annex B).

When must the coefficient of friction be measured?

After the flight deck coating is first applied, after it is re-applied during maintenance periods, and whenever doubt exists about the effectiveness of the coating's anti-slip properties (clause 0102, Details of the Agreement). ANEP-88 does not set a fixed calendar interval beyond those occasions.

Is ANEP-88 the same document as STANAG 1278?

No. ANEP-88 now carries the textual and procedural content, including the 0.6 minimum and the measurement methods, that used to sit directly inside STANAG 1278. STANAG 1278, in its current edition, is the covering standard recording nations' agreement to use ANEP-88.

What ComplyTrain does

One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.

  • Forms & Follow-up

    Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.

  • Controls & Assurance

    Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.

  • Project Planner

    Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.

  • Product Compliance

    Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.

  • Reporting & Analytics

    Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.

  • Media Monitoring

    The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.

  • Grants & Tenders

    AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.

  • Stakeholder/Vendor Management

    One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.

  • Requirements Management

    See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.

  • Risk Management

    Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.

  • Training Management

    Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.

  • Document Control

    Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.

  • Quality Management

    Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.

Latest from ComplyTrain

  • Compliance in medical device manufacturing: an overview

    Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.

Other standards in Maritime operations

  • AJP-3.1AJP-3.1 maritime operations doctrine
  • ANEP-83ANEP-83 shipborne helicopter and UAV harpoon-grid securing system
  • ANEP-86ANEP-86 submarine survival and escape standards
  • APP-29APP-29 embarked aviation crossdeck clearance criteria
  • ATP-3.4.1.2ATP-3.4.1.2 maritime support for humanitarian operations
  • ATP-16ATP/MTP-16 replenishment at sea procedures

Compliance work does not have to live in documents and spreadsheets

See ComplyTrain on your own processes in a 30-minute demo, with your quality or compliance lead.