Start a free trial
Menu

STANAG 2590

STANAG 2590 joint doctrine for stabilization operations

NATO member nations that ratify and implement AJP-3.28, the Allied joint doctrine for the military contribution to stabilization, into national doctrine and training

STANAG 2590 is NATO's ratification agreement committing member nations to implement AJP-3.28, the Allied joint doctrine for the military contribution to stabilization.

Edition
2
Published
2023-01-25

What it is

STANAG 2590 is the NATO Standardization Agreement covering AJP-3.28, the Allied joint doctrine for the military contribution to stabilization operations. This is Edition 2, promulgated 25 January 2023, superseding Edition 1 of 14 December 2015.

A STANAG is not the doctrine

A STANAG is the agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement a standard, not the technical or operational specification itself. STANAG 2590's own text is short and administrative: an aim, one interoperability requirement, the ratification and implementation machinery, and nothing else. The planning and execution detail the doctrine actually sets out lives in a separate publication, AJP-3.28, Edition A, which the STANAG names as the standard participating nations "agree to implement". Anyone looking for that operational content needs AJP-3.28 itself, not this cover agreement.

What it commits nations to

The stated aim is interoperability. The interoperability requirement reads: "To provide NATO/Coalition forces with a common doctrine for the planning and execution of stabilization operations in support of a host nation's government." Under the agreement clause, participating nations commit to a single named standard, AJP-3.28, Edition A. No other related document is listed, and this edition supersedes STANAG 2590, Edition 1, dated 14 December 2015.

Ratification and implementation are separate steps

STANAG 2590 binds a nation only once that nation ratifies it, and ratification and implementation are tracked as two distinct steps, both recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database (NSDD). Nations are invited to examine their ratification and advise the NATO Standardization Office of their ratification and implementation intentions. Implementation is defined concretely: AJP-3.28 being included into national doctrine, promulgated nationally, included in national education and training programmes, and used by the personnel and units that would operate in NATO operations or exercises. Allied nations and NATO bodies are then obliged to report implementation details through NATO's electronic reporting tool; partner nations are only invited to do the same. No NATO Effective Date applies to this edition, so there is no Alliance-wide deadline attached to either step.

How it's evaluated

STANAG 2590 describes no certification scheme and no audit. What it describes is nations reporting their ratification and implementation status to NATO for the record, and periodic review of the STANAG itself under AAP-03, with the result recorded in the NSDD. Nobody is "STANAG 2590 certified", and the document never uses that language. It says nothing about how conformity with AJP-3.28's own doctrine is checked in practice - that is a matter for whatever contract or tasking brings the doctrine into scope.

Standards it references

STANAG 2590 covers AJP-3.28, the Allied joint doctrine that carries the actual planning and execution content. Its own periodic review runs under AAP-03, which the STANAG names as the procedure its review follows, not as a source of technical content.

How we help

STANAG 2590 carries no technical or operational content of its own to evidence: everything to work against sits in AJP-3.28, the doctrine this agreement brings into force.

Where an organisation needs to show that its procedures, exercises or training follow a NATO-ratified doctrine, ComplyTrain holds that documentation - procedures, training records, exercise reports - with version history and an audit trail, ready for whoever asks to see it.

ComplyTrain does not tell you whether a given nation has ratified STANAG 2590, and it does not map to requirements in AJP-3.28 itself: neither is something a compliance platform can state on a nation's behalf.

Which STANAGs and Allied Publications actually apply to a given programme is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. Browse the explorer to see what sits alongside STANAG 2590 and AJP-3.28, and talk to us about the evidence trail once you know which ones are in your contract.

Questions

Is STANAG 2590 mandatory?

Only where a nation has ratified it and a contract or tasking invokes AJP-3.28. A STANAG binds a nation once ratified; it reaches a supplier through whatever tender or contract clause names the doctrine, not automatically.

What is the difference between STANAG 2590 and AJP-3.28?

STANAG 2590 is the ratification agreement; AJP-3.28 is the doctrine itself. STANAG 2590's own text sets out no planning or execution detail - it commits participating nations to implement AJP-3.28.

What edition of STANAG 2590 is current?

Edition 2, promulgated 25 January 2023. It supersedes STANAG 2590, Edition 1, dated 14 December 2015.

Does NATO certify organisations against STANAG 2590?

No. The document names no certification scheme; NATO's own role is limited to recording nations' ratification and implementation status in the NSDD and reviewing the STANAG under AAP-03.

Does STANAG 2590 set a deadline for implementation?

No. Its "NATO Effective Date (NED)" is marked "Not applicable" in this edition, so there is no Alliance-wide date attached; whatever deadline applies comes from a nation's own timetable or a contract that invokes the doctrine.