Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 2920
Makers and buyers of personal armour, including combat helmets, who must evaluate and classify its protection against bullet and fragment threats.
STANAG 2920 is NATO's unreleased agreement on procedures for evaluating and classifying personal armour against bullet and fragment threats. This page describes it from the Czech implementation and a NATO publication that cites it.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 2920 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on the classification of personal armour. Edition 3 was promulgated in June 2015 under CNAD, AC/225 NAAG, LCGDSS, and it covers AEP-2920 edition A. NATO has not released STANAG 2920 publicly, so this page describes it from the Czech defence standard that implements it and a NATO publication that cites it.
The Czech defence standard ČOS 130027, on the ballistic resistance of personal protective equipment against fragment threats by a modified method, implements STANAG 2920 edition 3 and AEP-2920(A). Its Czech index entry describes a uniform procedure for determining and classifying the ballistic resistance of personal protective equipment against fragment threats to people, using fragment-simulating projectiles (FSP).
AEP-2902, NATO's publication on the non-ballistic performance of combat helmets, lists it among its normative references as "STANAG 2920 Edition 3 - Procedures for the Evaluation and Classification of Personal Armour - Bullet and Fragmentation Threats." It places ballistic test standards and methods, Behind Helmet Blunt Trauma (BHBT) test standards and methods, and Back Face Deformation (BFD) test standards and methods outside its own non-ballistic scope, as requirements "included in STANAG 2920 Edition 3". Elsewhere it states that "Ballistic performance, including associated testing of bullets and fragments are detailed in STANAG 2920 Classification of Personal Armour Systems" and that "Hostile threats are dealt with in STANAG 2920."
A supplier bound by STANAG 2920 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 2920 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.