Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 4145
Makers and testers of land military materiel required to demonstrate nuclear survivability, and the national acceptance authorities that oversee that testing.
STANAG 4145 sets NATO's nuclear hardening criteria for armed forces material (land), AEP-04 edition B. NATO has not released it publicly; this page describes it from public NATO publications that cite it.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 4145 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on nuclear hardening criteria for armed forces material (land). The current edition, edition 3, was promulgated in August 2026 under CNAD, AC/225 NAAG, JCBRND CDG, and covers AEP-04 edition B.
NATO has not released STANAG 4145 publicly, so this page describes it from public NATO publications that cite it.
The public NATO publications below cite it under the title Nuclear Survivability Criteria for Armed Forces Materiel and Installations. AMedP-7.5 lists AEP-4 (STANAG 4145) of September 1996 and marks it NATO CONFIDENTIAL.
AECTP-250 separates electromagnetic pulse into high-altitude EMP (HEMP), source-region EMP (SREMP) and system-generated EMP (SGEMP), and states that the classified definitions for HEMP and SREMP are in STANAG 4145.
In AECTP-500, for ships, STANAG 4145 "describes in detail the waveform of the test impulse" used in the nuclear EMP test. For land systems, the test uses the unclassified EMP waveform of AECTP 256 and AECTP 501 and, if the National Acceptance Authority specifies it, also the classified HEMP and SREMP waveform requirements in STANAG 4145.
AMedP-7.5 names AEP-4 as a source of blast shielding protection-factor values and does not reproduce them, citing classification and distribution limitations.
AOP-15 refers to STANAG 4145 and AEP-04 for the threat level where a munition must withstand air blast, thermal or ionizing radiation, or initial nuclear radiation. STANAG 4599 lists the effects of a nuclear explosion, EMP, initial nuclear radiation, air blast and thermal radiation, as defined in STANAG 4145 (AEP-4) and AEP-22.
A supplier bound by STANAG 4145 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 4145 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.