Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
ATrainP-5
NATO nations that ratify STANAG 6001, adopting this table to state, record and compare language proficiency for their own personnel, not a requirement placed on companies
ATrainP-5 sets NATO's six-level (0-5) scale for rating listening, speaking, reading and writing proficiency in a language, used by nations under STANAG 6001 to record and compare requirements for international appointments.
ATrainP-5 is NATO's Allied Training Publication that gives participating nations a shared table for describing an individual's proficiency in a language. Its own aim clause states that it exists "to provide NATO forces with a table describing language proficiency levels" (clause 1.1), and nations adopt it for three purposes: communicating language requirements for international staff appointments, recording and reporting proficiency in international correspondence, and comparing national standards through one shared scale while preserving each nation's right to maintain its own internal proficiency standards. Nations record their agreement to use it in STANAG 6001: the Letter of Promulgation states that "the agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 6001." The current edition, Edition A Version 2, was promulgated in May 2016 and is effective on receipt, superseding Version 1.
Nowhere does the text name a supplier, manufacturer or other commercial role. The people actually rated against the scale are individuals, assessed by whichever training or testing arrangement their own nation runs; a company meets this only at one remove, where a role or a customer requirement specifies a result on the scale.
Clause 1.3 sets the scale itself: six base levels, 0 through 5, labelled No proficiency, Survival, Functional, Professional, Expert and Highly-articulate native, scored separately for each of four skills - listening, speaking, reading and writing - which Annex A describes in full for every level. This page does not reproduce those descriptions; they are the substance a rater works from directly. Annex B adds a further set of intermediate "plus" levels, 0+ through 4+, for use "for training, evaluation, recording, or reporting purposes" where ability "substantially exceeds a 0 through 4 base skill level, but does not fully or consistently meet all of the criteria for the next higher base level" (clause 1.3); a footnote to Annex B puts the same idea numerically, describing plus-level proficiency as more than halfway between two base levels.
Clause 1.4 fixes the order a full profile is reported in - listening, then speaking, then reading, then writing - and clause 1.5 fixes the format itself: the four digits follow the letters SLP, for Standardized Language Profile, so that a profile such as SLP 3321 means level 3 listening, level 3 speaking, level 2 reading and level 1 writing.
Three reservations were recorded at promulgation, and they show how much discretion a nation keeps. Belgium's own testing centre certifies levels 1 through 4 only, without using Annex B's interpolated plus values for its certificates. Canada applies the whole agreement only to members of the Canadian Forces involved in NATO affairs. Italy does not commit to the level-5 threshold that clause 1.1.a) would otherwise carry for certain international appointments. The document names no NATO-level certification scheme anywhere: what gets assessed is an individual, by a nation's own arrangement, not an organisation by an external body.
NATO publishes ATrainP-5 through the Standardization Document Database at no charge; the NSDD listing for ATrainP-5 is the source. ComplyTrain does not sell it or host a copy.
ATrainP-5 places no requirement on a company: the scale is defined and applied by nations, and it is a nation's own training or testing arrangement, not a vendor, that assesses and certifies an individual against it. Where a role or a customer requirement specifies a Standardized Language Profile, an organisation still needs the same kind of evidence trail it keeps for any other competency requirement: which named individual was assessed, against which level, on what date, and by which national arrangement. ComplyTrain is a controlled-document and training-record platform, so it is a natural place to hold that record alongside a person's other competency and training records, linked to the role or appointment it supports.
What ComplyTrain does not do: it does not assess language proficiency, issue a Standardized Language Profile, or stand in for a nation's own testing centre. Which profile a specific role or contract requires is set by the customer's own quality clause and appointment criteria, not by us. The standards explorer shows what else sits alongside ATrainP-5 in the catalogue, and we are glad to talk through what a specific contract or appointment actually requires.
Tell us how you need to work with ATrainP-5 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. ATrainP-5 addresses participating nations, which "adopt the appended table of language proficiency levels" for their own staffing and reporting purposes; it names no supplier, contractor or company role anywhere in the text. A company encounters it only where a customer requirement or an appointment specifies a result on the scale, such as a Standardized Language Profile.
STANAG 6001 is the agreement by which NATO nations commit to use ATrainP-5. The Letter of Promulgation states that "the agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 6001," and a nation is bound once it has ratified that STANAG, sometimes with reservations against specific points.
SLP stands for Standardized Language Profile. The four digits are reported in a fixed order - listening, speaking, reading, writing - so SLP 3321 means level 3 listening, level 3 speaking, level 2 reading and level 1 writing (clause 1.5).
No. The document names no NATO accreditation, audit or certification scheme. Assessment is carried out by a nation's own training or testing arrangement; the Belgian reservation, for example, describes certificates issued by "the Belgian testing centre" against the base levels only.
They are intermediate ratings, 0+ through 4+, for proficiency that "substantially exceeds a 0 through 4 base skill level, but does not fully or consistently meet all of the criteria for the next higher base level" (clause 1.3). They exist for training, evaluation, recording or reporting purposes where a base level alone would be too coarse.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.