Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
MISP-2019.1
Suppliers of Motion Imagery Systems whose products must meet MISP-2019.1 under a US or NATO government contract or programme that names it
MISP-2019.1 is the US Motion Imagery Standards Board's profile of mandatory imagery, compression, container and metadata requirements for Motion Imagery Systems used by US and NATO forces.
MISP-2019.1, the Motion Imagery Standards Profile, is a technical document written and published by the US Motion Imagery Standards Board (MISB). It sets mandatory formats, encodings, containers and metadata for "Motion Imagery" - a sequence of images with the potential to carry informational or intelligence value - used across the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) community. It is not a NATO publication in its own right: NATO's STANAG 4609 is, in its current editions, a covering document rather than a standalone specification, and it "points directly to" this MISP edition instead of restating its content. That is why the document states its requirements are common to "the United States (U.S.) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) coalition partners" - the technical content lives here, and NATO nations reach it through the STANAG cover.
Everything in the MISP is organised around four Classes. Class 0 is uncompressed Motion Imagery with unrestricted characteristics - the raw output of an imaging sensor. Class 1 is compressed Motion Imagery limited to three colour bands at 8 bits each, used when transmission bandwidth is constrained, and carried in an MPEG-2 Transport Stream. Class 2 is compressed Motion Imagery whose characteristics exceed Class 1's limits: large-volume imagery, scientific and engineering imaging, and high bit-depth infrared. Class 3 covers sources outside the ISR ecosystem entirely - cell phones, mobile devices, surveillance cameras - which the MISP requires to be normalised into a conformant form before use, rather than exempting them.
The MISP bans interlaced-scan video outright: the requirement "specifically bans the use of interlaced-scan formats, such as NTSC, PAL, SECAM, and High Definition 1080i" for any conformant system, so progressive scan is the only option for new or updated equipment. Only the Containers the MISP names may be used for Class 0, 1 and 2 Motion Imagery. Class 1 Motion Imagery must be compressed with H.265/HEVC, H.264/AVC or H.262/MPEG-2 at specific profile-and-level combinations, with Metadata encoded as Key-Length-Value (KLV) and Audio compressed to a named MISB standard. Every frame must carry a timestamp representing Absolute Time, and an instantiation of Motion Imagery must use a single timestamp representation throughout - switching formats mid-stream is not allowed. Every item of Motion Imagery must carry a Core Identifier and Security Metadata; the document is explicit that correct, consistent security marking is mandatory for "all Motion Imagery Data". Overlaid graphics and text must be non-destructive to the underlying imagery - "'burned-in metadata' is not allowed" - which is easy to miss in a system that renders overlays by default. Airborne platforms carry an additional obligation: the Motion Imagery Sensor Minimum Metadata Set, which the document calls a prerequisite for MISP conformance in that domain.
Dissemination requirements cover the network side - Internet Protocol, UDP for time-sensitive delivery, TCP where reliability matters more than speed, and Real Time Protocol for combined audio/video/metadata streams. External Interfaces map Motion Imagery to systems outside its own ecosystem: conversion to Cursor on Target messages, integration into the STANAG 4559 Data Model, and the STANAG 4586 control messages used to direct a sensor and select its compression, container and delivery format.
MISP-2019.1 names no certification body and describes no accreditation scheme. What it does describe is a Standard-level requirement being written into a contract: a Standard "should be identified in Government procurement actions as a mandatory conformance item for vendor offerings to be accepted by the Government." In practice that means a government buyer checks a vendor's Motion Imagery System against the relevant class, compression, container and metadata requirements before accepting it under contract - not a third party issuing a certificate. The document also insists that meeting the requirements on paper is not enough: conformance "can only be guaranteed through rigorous testing procedures," though the MISP itself does not describe who runs that testing beyond the class-specific conformance-testing standards it names (MPEG-2 compliance testing under ISO/IEC 13818-4, JPEG2000 conformance testing under ISO/IEC 15444-4).
The MISP sets no requirement for Ground, Sea or Space Motion Imagery Collections - it recommends falling back to the Airborne Collection where none is defined. It does not standardise Audio Content beyond a quality-loss reference, and it explicitly declines to define the "mechanical interconnects between sub-systems." It also draws a distinction worth knowing before it costs someone a contract dispute: "Full Motion Video" (FMV) has no formal MISP definition, and the document says plainly that the term "should not be used in any contractual language" - a contract that specifies "FMV compliance" has not specified MISP-2019.1 compliance.
Beyond NATO's STANAG 4609 cover, the MISP requires compliance with STANAG 4545 (NATO Secondary Imagery Format) and its US counterpart MIL-STD-2500 for imagery extracted into NITF/NSIF form, and its own technical Structure is built on commercial coding standards - ISO/IEC 23008-2 and ITU-T H.265 for HEVC, ISO/IEC 14496-10 and ITU-T H.264 for AVC, ISO/IEC 13818 for MPEG-2, and SMPTE ST 377-1 for the Material Exchange Format - that sit outside our catalogue entirely.
MISP-2019.1 is an operational and technical standard: the engineering it calls for happens in the imaging, compression and network equipment itself, not in a compliance platform. Evidencing it in practice means documenting which Class, compression profile, container and metadata set a given system is built to, keeping the test records that back a conformance claim made to a government buyer, and training the engineers who configure Motion Imagery systems against those requirements.
That is the work ComplyTrain supports in general: a controlled place to hold the configuration and test-evidence procedures a contract asks for, version history showing who changed what and when, and training records for the staff responsible for MISP conformance. What ComplyTrain does not do is the engineering itself - it will not encode, compress or transmit Motion Imagery, and it will not run the conformance testing the MISP calls for or certify a system against it, because no such certification exists.
Which parts of MISP-2019.1 apply to a given programme, and alongside which other documents, is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by the MISP alone. See the standards explorer for what sits alongside MISP-2019.1, including STANAG 4609, and talk to us about the evidence trail your contract actually requires.
Tell us how you need to work with MISP-2019.1 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
MISP-2019.1, the Motion Imagery Standards Profile, is the US Motion Imagery Standards Board's technical specification for the formats, compression, containers and metadata a Motion Imagery System must use. It is written for the US and NATO coalition partners and reaches NATO nations through STANAG 4609, which covers it rather than restating it.
Only where a contract or programme invokes it. The document itself says its requirements "are not considered voluntary; they are mandatory" once they apply, but nothing in the MISP obliges an organisation on its own account - it binds through a government procurement action or through NATO's STANAG 4609.
No. The document names no accredited certification body and describes no certification scheme. Conformance is checked when a government buyer accepts a vendor's Motion Imagery System under a contract that names the MISP as a mandatory requirement, not through third-party certification.
STANAG 4609 is NATO's agreement; as of its current editions it is a cover document that points directly to the US Motion Imagery Standards Profile rather than stating its own technical content. MISP-2019.1 is that technical content - the formats, compression and metadata requirements themselves.
The document is published directly by the Motion Imagery Standards Board. It is also listed free of charge in NATO's Standardization Document Database, where our catalogue holds it. NATO's documents are not sold by ComplyTrain and we host no copies of them.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.