Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 3606
Manufacturers of military laser systems, and the range safety staff, host nations and user nations who evaluate and approve their use on NATO and allied outdoor ranges.
STANAG 3606 is the NATO agreement on evaluating and controlling laser hazards on NATO and allied outdoor ranges. NATO has not released it publicly; this page describes it from the Czech defence standard that implements an earlier edition of it.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 3606 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on laser safety evaluation for outdoor military environments. Edition 8, promulgated in November 2024, is sponsored by NATO's MC, MCLSB, NRS and LSP, and covers the publication ARSP-4.
NATO has not released STANAG 3606 or ARSP-4 publicly. This page describes them from a public national implementation, the Czech defence standard ČOS 051636 (2nd edition, effective from January 2017), which states that it introduces STANAG 3606 edition 6 and ARSP-4 edition A into Czech use. NATO's current editions are STANAG 3606 edition 8 and ARSP-4 edition C, so the Czech implementation describes an earlier state of the agreement, and a national implementation can also add its own requirements and reservations. Treat what follows as the Czech implementation's content, not as NATO's current text.
ČOS 051636 sets out safety rules for operating lasers in all outdoor military areas used by NATO and allied forces, including training, test and operational areas. Its stated purpose is to give states a common basis for evaluating laser hazards, so that an assessment carried out by one nation can be accepted by another and forces training together do not have to duplicate it. It sets out two evaluation methods: deterministic risk assessment, which compares a laser's likely exposure against internationally accepted maximum permissible exposure limits to calculate a nominal ocular hazard distance and a nominal hazard zone around the beam; and probabilistic risk assessment, which combines the main hazard factors into an overall probability and compares it against a risk level each state sets for itself. It places lasers into one of seven hazard classes, following the classification method of ČSN EN 60825-1 (the Czech adoption of IEC 60825-1), from class 1 lasers that are not hazardous in foreseeable use to class 4 lasers that can injure the eye and skin and ignite flammable material.
The standard sets out separate duties for the host nation, which has sovereign control of the range, and the user nation, whose unit is operating there. The user nation must give the host nation the hazard classification of every laser system it intends to use; the host nation approves the laser's operating position, target area, safety angles and hazard zones, and provides warning signage that follows ČSN EN 60825-1. It groups controls into three tiers in order of priority: engineering controls such as enclosures, alignment and interlocks; procedural and administrative controls such as standard operating procedures, operator training and restricting laser use to approved ranges; and personal protective equipment such as laser eye protection.
A supplier bound by STANAG 3606 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 3606 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.