Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 3689
National mapping and charting agencies in NATO member and partner nations
STANAG 3689 is NATO's agreement for member nations to implement AGeoP-25, which sets the method for spelling place names on maps and charts.
STANAG 3689 is the NATO Standardization Agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement AGeoP-25, Edition A, the Allied Publication that actually sets out the method for spelling place names on maps and charts. The STANAG itself carries no spelling rules: under "Agreement," "Participating nations agree to implement the following standard", and that publication is where the naming detail lives. Edition 6 of the STANAG, promulgated 1 October 2019, supersedes Edition 5.
The agreement binds NATO's participating (member) nations once they ratify it, and separately invites partner nations to adopt it. Ratification and implementation are tracked apart: nations are asked to examine their ratification and, where they have not already done so, tell the NATO Standardization Office their intention. A nation counts as having implemented the STANAG once it has issued instructions to spell place names in its mapping and charting in accordance with the agreement, and reports that implementation in line with AAP-03. National decisions on ratification and implementation are recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database.
The STANAG names no supplier, contractor or company. It obliges nations, and a nation carries it out through its own mapping and charting agencies.
The agreement accepts that full implementation is not practicable all at once. Existing map and chart series are corrected progressively, "as far as possible on all scales together" until complete standardisation is achieved, so the STANAG describes an ongoing programme of correction across a nation's map and chart holdings rather than a single date every series has to meet.
The agreement sits under NATO's Military Committee Joint Standardization Board, through its Joint Geospatial Standards working group, and is reviewed in accordance with AAP-03, with the outcome recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database. Its custodian nation is the United Kingdom. A nation or NATO body may propose a change at any time, for the tasking authority to process at the next review.
STANAG 3689 sets out no place-name spelling rule, transliteration system or naming authority of its own; that detail sits entirely in AGeoP-25. It also names no assessment or certification scheme. The only check it describes is a nation issuing its own implementing instructions and reporting them.
Read on its own, STANAG 3689 gives a mapping or charting organisation nothing to implement in software: it is an agreement between NATO nations, and the spelling method itself sits in AGeoP-25. Where this reaches an organisation working alongside a NATO mapping programme, it is usually through a contract or tender clause that names AGeoP-25 rather than the STANAG number itself.
For that kind of work, ComplyTrain's usual footprint applies: holding the instructions a mapping or charting unit has issued for spelling place names as controlled documents, recording that staff producing or correcting maps and charts have been trained against them, and keeping the audit trail a customer's quality representative would ask for as standardisation proceeds across a map or chart series.
ComplyTrain does not draw, correct or approve a map or chart, and it does not declare a nation's mapping and charting agency conformant to AGeoP-25 - that is a national cartographic function, not something a compliance tool does on anyone's behalf.
Which tier of NATO geospatial documentation applies on a given programme is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by this page. See what sits alongside STANAG 3689 in the standards explorer, or talk to us about the day-to-day evidence trail it takes to show you followed it.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 3689 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
It binds a NATO nation once that nation has ratified it, and it reaches a supplier only when a contract, tender or national specification names AGeoP-25. Ratification and implementation are recorded separately in the NATO Standardization Document Database, so a nation can have ratified the STANAG without yet having finished issuing implementing instructions. Outside a contract or tender naming AGeoP-25, the STANAG creates no obligation of its own for a supplier.
AGeoP-25 is the Allied Publication STANAG 3689 brings into force: the document that actually sets out the method for spelling place names on maps and charts. STANAG 3689 is the nations' agreement to implement it, not the spelling method itself.
The custodian nation is the United Kingdom, and the agreement is supervised under NATO's Military Committee Joint Standardization Board through its Joint Geospatial Standards working group.
Edition 6, promulgated 1 October 2019, is the current edition and supersedes Edition 5. The document itself does not describe what changed between the two editions.
No. The STANAG names no certification or assessment scheme. The only check it describes is a nation issuing its own implementing instructions and reporting them, in accordance with AAP-03.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.