Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANREC 4805
National defence test and evaluation authorities deciding which NATO trial protocol to follow for electronic countermeasure compatibility against radio controlled IEDs
STANREC 4805 is a NATO recommendation, not a binding agreement, pointing nations to AEP-4805 Edition A for trial and testing procedures assessing compatibility of Allied electronic countermeasures against radio controlled IEDs.
STANREC 4805 is a NATO Standardization Recommendation covering compatibility trial procedures for electronic countermeasures. As with every STANREC, the distinction that matters most is in its name: unlike a STANAG, it does not commit a nation to ratify anything. The document's own Implementation clause is explicit that it "is a non-binding document employed on a voluntary basis and does not require commitment of the nations to implement the standards which are listed in it." Nothing in these five pages creates a duty for a supplier to sign up to directly.
The document's stated aim is "to list recommended practices regarding" trial and testing, and it gives that scope in full: "Trial and testing protocols and best practice for the trials and testing of force protection electronic countermeasure capabilities to assess compatibility of Allied electronic countermeasure for radio controlled improvised explosive device systems." The entire substantive content of STANREC 4805 beyond that scope statement is one line: "The following standard is recommended: AEP-4805, Edition A." The document does not itself set out the trial procedures or test criteria; it names the one Allied Publication that does, and stops there. Anyone who needs the actual trial and testing content has to read AEP-4805 itself, not this covering recommendation.
The text separately names, without saying this recommendation depends on it, STANREC 4756, Overview of Inhibition Trial Procedure for Barrage ECM against Point-to-Point Radio Links, alongside AEP-4756. These sit in the same trial and testing area of the family, not content this STANREC binds anyone to.
This is Edition 1, promulgated 9 July 2018. The text states plainly that "This STANREC does not supersede any document," so there is no prior edition behind it.
STANREC 4805 "is to be reviewed at least once every three years," with "the result of the review... recorded within the NSDD." Outside that cycle, "Nations and NATO bodies may propose changes, at any time, through a standardization proposal to the tasking authority (TA)," to be processed at the next review. The recommendation is supervised under the Conference of National Armaments Directors (CNAD), through the NATO Air Force Armaments Group (AC/224 NAFAG) and Aerospace Capability Group 3 (ACG3), with the United States named as custodian.
STANREC 4805 is a pointer, not a specification: it names AEP-4805 as the recommended trial and testing protocol for electronic countermeasure compatibility and stops there. There is nothing in these five pages to implement in software, and the document does not itself describe what running those trials involves - that content lives in AEP-4805. As with any operational or technical NATO publication, the work is done in the trial and testing programme itself, not in a compliance tool.
What this document does leave an organisation to do is track whether a national test programme or a contract actually calls up AEP-4805, and, once it does, hold whatever trial procedures, test records and reviews that programme brings with it. ComplyTrain gives a place to hold that kind of procedure and evidence, and to keep a record of who reviewed it, the same way it does for any other documented requirement a contract introduces.
ComplyTrain does not run or design electronic countermeasure compatibility trials, and it does not tell a programme whether AEP-4805, STANREC 4756 or AEP-4756 applies to it - that is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by this page. Our standards explorer shows what sits alongside STANREC 4805; if you're weighing up what a tender's test and evaluation clause is actually asking for, we're glad to talk it through.
Tell us how you need to work with STANREC 4805 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
No. A STANREC is a recommendation, not an agreement: NATO nations are invited to use the trial protocol it names, without the ratification obligation a STANAG carries. Whether AEP-4805 applies to a specific programme is a question for that programme's contract.
A STANAG is an agreement nations ratify and commit to implement. A STANREC recommends a standard without that obligation - nations are invited to use it, and to propose changes to it through the tasking authority, but nothing requires them to adopt it.
One recommendation: that nations use AEP-4805, Edition A, for trial and testing protocols assessing the compatibility of Allied force protection electronic countermeasure equipment against radio controlled improvised explosive devices. The STANREC itself contains no trial methodology; it names the document that does.
STANREC 4805 names STANREC 4756, Overview of Inhibition Trial Procedure for Barrage ECM against Point-to-Point Radio Links, alongside AEP-4756, under "other related documents." Neither is said to depend on the other; they sit in the same trial and testing area as adjacent reading.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
A 90-day plan for the smallest defence suppliers: let the tender set your scope, document what you already do, fix the security basics primes check, and keep the system small enough for two people to maintain.
Learn how to qualify, approve and monitor sub-suppliers, flow down requirements through purchase orders, and keep the records an auditor will ask to see under ISO 9001 clause 8.4 and AQAP.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.