Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
APRP-3.3.7.9
NATO nations responsible for supplying horse collar/rescue strop hoisting gear to their own search and rescue helicopter assets
APRP-3.3.7.9 sets NATO's minimum characteristics for horse collar/rescue strop helicopter hoisting gear, which nations are encouraged, not required, to meet.
APRP-3.3.7.9, Horse Collar/Rescue Strop Type Helicopter Hoisting Gear, is a NATO Allied Personnel Recovery Publication. Its aim, in its own words, is "to standardize the horse collar/rescue strop type helicopter hoisting gear used by NATO forces and thereby help assure greater interoperability between national Search and Rescue (SAR) organizations." It is covered by STANAG 3295, the agreement through which the publication acquires force, and it names STANAG 7224, Water Survival Training for Aircrews and Designated Flying Personnel, as a related document without restating its content. Edition A, Version 1, promulgated in December 2021, is the edition in front of this page.
The publication speaks to nations, not to a manufacturer or a certification body. It states plainly: "The make and model of strop to provide to their rotary wing assets is a national responsibility." Its own language toward a common standard is an invitation rather than a mandate: "Nations are encouraged to supply strops which meet or exceed the standard." A supplier meets APRP-3.3.7.9, where it meets it at all, because a national procurement specification or contract calls up its characteristics, not because the publication addresses a company directly.
The publication sets five qualitative characteristics a horse collar or rescue strop has to meet, without expressing any of them as a number. It has to be strong and long enough to hold a survivor safely; be a bright colour to aid visibility during a rescue; carry a pictorial donning sequence on the strop itself, so an untrained person can still work out how to wear it; be designed, or have operating procedures, that stop a survivor slipping free during winching; and be buoyant for use over water. None of these is a dimension or a test threshold: the publication leaves the engineering that meets them to the nation and its supplier.
APRP-3.3.7.9 sits under STANAG 3295 in NATO's doctrine hierarchy. Adoption is not uniform: the publication's own Record of Reservations shows the Czech Republic recording that it will not provide SAR operations above sea level and that its gear is for trained personnel only, and France recording no commitment to the pictorial donning sequence. The publication is unclassified and, like every NATO standardization document, is issued by NATO free of charge; the Standardization Document Database is the authoritative source for the current list of reservations.
The publication names no certification body, no government quality-assurance surveillance, no notified body and no self-declaration route anywhere in its text. The nearest thing to a check it describes is the reservation process itself: a nation records, at the point of promulgation, where its own practice departs from the standard, rather than being assessed and passed or failed against it.
APRP-3.3.7.9 is an equipment specification, not a management-system standard: whether a horse collar/rescue strop meets its five characteristics is a fact about a physical product, decided by the nation and the supplier that specify and build it, not something a compliance platform determines.
What an organisation can evidence is the paperwork around that decision: that its procurement specification calls up the publication's characteristics, that the strops it holds match the specification, and that any national reservation it takes is recorded and can be produced on request. ComplyTrain holds that specification as a controlled document, keeps the record of what equipment was approved against it, and gives an auditor a trail from the requirement to what was actually supplied.
ComplyTrain does not test, certify or manufacture a rescue strop, and does not decide whether a given design meets the publication's characteristics; that judgement stays with the nation and its supplier. Which tier of personnel-recovery standards applies to a given programme is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. See the standards explorer for what sits alongside APRP-3.3.7.9, and talk to us about the evidence trail behind a rescue-equipment procurement.
Tell us how you need to work with APRP-3.3.7.9 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Not directly. APRP-3.3.7.9 addresses nations, and even at the national level its own language is encouragement rather than a mandate: "Nations are encouraged to supply strops which meet or exceed the standard." A supplier meets it only where a national procurement specification or contract calls up its characteristics.
No. The publication names no certification body, notified body or accredited scheme of any kind. It sets qualitative characteristics for a piece of rescue equipment, not a standard a company or product is certified against.
STANAG 3295 is the Standardization Agreement, the record of nations' commitment to the publication. APRP-3.3.7.9 is the Allied Publication itself, the document STANAG 3295 covers, and where its characteristics actually live.
No. It sets five qualitative characteristics, such as strength, visibility and buoyancy, and leaves the engineering that meets them to the nation and its supplier.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.