Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 3374
Flight-inspection units and the airfield and navaid maintenance organisations that keep NATO radio and radar navigation and approach aids calibrated.
STANAG 3374 (AEtP-1) is the NATO agreement setting the methods, tolerances and flight manoeuvres for flight-inspecting NATO's radio and radar navigation and approach aids. NATO has not released it publicly; this page describes it from the Czech implementation, ČOS 584101.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 3374 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on flight inspection of NATO radio/radar navigation and approach aids. Edition 7, promulgated in March 2015 under NATO's AVC, ATM-CNS AG and ACNST WG, covers the publication AEtP-1, edition E. Its purpose, as the Czech implementation puts it, is to define the methods, tolerances and flight manoeuvres for flight-inspecting NATO's ground-based radio and radar navigation and approach aids, so as to ensure the equivalence of navigational aids in a multinational military environment and interoperability between nations' flight-inspection resources.
NATO has not released STANAG 3374 or AEtP-1 publicly. This page describes them from a public national implementation, the Czech defence standard ČOS 584101 (3rd edition, 2017), which states that it introduces STANAG 3374 edition 7 and AEtP-1(E) into Czech use for the ground navaids in service with the Czech armed forces. A national implementation can add national requirements and reservations, so treat what follows as the Czech implementation's content, not as NATO's own text.
ČOS 584101 recognises three kinds of flight inspection: a full inspection after a navaid is installed and before it enters service, a routine periodic inspection that checks for signal drift and confirms safe obstacle clearance, and an unscheduled inspection triggered by a disputed accuracy, an equipment change, an environmental change, a user complaint or an aircraft accident. It sets recommended maximum intervals between periodic inspections: 180-360 days for a stationary ILS, MLS or precision approach radar and 90-180 days for a mobile one; 360-720 days for a stationary VOR and 180-720 days for a stationary TACAN, both 90-360 days if mobile. Intervals are tightened whenever a navaid's technical parameters become questionable. Personnel performing flight inspection must be qualified in their specialism, and the inspection aircraft needs calibrated receivers, analysers and recording equipment.
ČOS 584101 sets, for each type of navaid, a table of the minimum parameters to check at post-installation and at periodic inspection. A VOR is checked for radial alignment, reference radial, coverage, course signal structure, modulation, identification and receiver checkpoints; an ILS localiser and glidepath for course-line accuracy, signal structure, modulation, polarisation and monitoring; a TACAN, DME transponder, NDB, primary and secondary surveillance radar and UHF/VHF direction finder for their own accuracy, coverage and identification parameters; and a PAPI, VASI or approach lighting system for glide angle, light intensity, colour, symmetry and range. Where a parameter is covered by ICAO standards, ČOS 584101 cites the relevant clause of ICAO Annex 10 or Doc 8071. TACAN and MLS, which ICAO's manual does not cover, are given their own detailed methodologies in the standard's annexes.
A supplier bound by STANAG 3374 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 3374 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.