Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 3474
Defence organisations managing aircrew whose parent nation's directive or contract invokes STANAG 3474 or the AAMedP-1.6 publication it covers
STANAG 3474 is NATO's ratification agreement committing member nations to implement AAMedP-1.6, Edition A, the Allied Aeromedical Publication on temporary flying restrictions affecting aircrew.
STANAG 3474 is the NATO Standardization Agreement covering temporary flying restrictions due to exogenous factors affecting aircrew. This is Edition 6, promulgated 19 July 2018, superseding Edition 5 of the same STANAG.
A STANAG is the agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement a standard, not the technical specification itself. STANAG 3474's own text is short and administrative: an aim, an interoperability requirement, and the ratification and reporting machinery. The restrictions themselves are set out in a separate publication, AAMedP-1.6, Edition A, which the STANAG names as the standard participating nations "agree to implement". Anyone managing aircrew medical status against those restrictions needs AAMedP-1.6's own text, not this cover agreement.
The stated aim is interoperability: to "standardize the minimum temporary restrictions to be placed upon aircrew following random exposure to certain physiological conditions in order to facilitate the exchange of comparable information between nations and enhance interoperability." This STANAG names the mechanism only; it does not itself list the physiological conditions, the substances, or the restriction periods that AAMedP-1.6 sets out.
STANAG 3474 binds nations, not aircrew or medical officers directly. It is "effective upon receipt and ready to be used by the implementing nations and NATO bodies", and it becomes binding on a given nation through ratification, which "has been ratified by member nations, as reflected in the NATO Standardization Document Database (NSDD)". Partner nations "are invited to adopt this STANAG" rather than being bound to it. Implementation is reported separately: nations "are invited to report on its effective implementation of the STANAG in accordance with AAP-03."
This STANAG "is to be reviewed at least once every five years", with the result recorded in the NSDD, and a nation or NATO body may propose a change at any time through a standardization proposal to the tasking authority. The document's Other Related Documents entry names STANAG 3527, on aircrew fatigue management, as related reading rather than as something this STANAG requires.
STANAG 3474 describes no certification scheme and no audit. What it describes is nations reporting their ratification and implementation status to NATO for the record; nobody is "STANAG 3474 certified", and the document never uses that language. Where an aircrew member's fitness or a unit's aeromedical procedures do get assessed in practice, the assessor and the evidence required are set by the applicable national authority or medical command, not by this STANAG.
STANAG 3474 covers AAMedP-1.6, the Allied Aeromedical Publication that carries the actual restrictions. It names STANAG 3527, on aircrew fatigue management, as related reading. Implementation reporting runs under AAP-03.
STANAG 3474's restrictions are followed in day-to-day aeromedical and flight-operations practice, not in a compliance platform: a medical officer or flight surgeon applies whatever AAMedP-1.6 sets out, an operations staff tracks when a restriction starts and ends, and a quality or safety department retains the records that prove the process was followed for the current edition of the publication.
What ComplyTrain does for that kind of work generally is give a defence organisation one auditable place to hold the procedures for recording a temporary restriction, the training records for the personnel who apply them, and the evidence trail - non-conformances, corrective actions, document control - that a national authority or a customer's quality representative will ask to see.
ComplyTrain does not determine a restriction, assess an aircrew member's fitness to fly, or decide which edition of AAMedP-1.6 a unit has adopted. That is aeromedical and command work, carried out against the publication itself and whatever national or service directive applies.
Which STANAGs and Allied Publications actually apply to a given unit or contract is set by the customer's quality clause and national guidance, not by us. Browse the explorer to see what sits alongside STANAG 3474 and AAMedP-1.6, and talk to us about the evidence trail once you know which ones are in your contract.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 3474 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Only where a nation has ratified it, and it reaches an aircrew member or a unit only where a national directive or contract invokes AAMedP-1.6. Partner nations are only "invited to adopt this STANAG" rather than bound to it.
STANAG 3474 is the NATO ratification agreement; AAMedP-1.6, Edition A is the Allied Aeromedical Publication that actually sets out the restrictions. Ratifying STANAG 3474 is how a nation commits to implement AAMedP-1.6.
No. STANAG 3474 describes nations ratifying the agreement and reporting implementation to NATO, recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database. It describes no certification or audit scheme for a supplier, a unit, or a medical officer.
The STANAG "is to be reviewed at least once every five years", with the result recorded in the NSDD. This edition, Edition 6, was promulgated 19 July 2018 and supersedes Edition 5.
STANAG 3527, on aircrew fatigue management, is named in STANAG 3474's Other Related Documents entry as related reading, not as a requirement this STANAG imposes.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.