Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 7165
Defence organisations, and their medical equipment or training suppliers, working to a contract that invokes STANAG 7165 or the AAMedP-1.9 publication it covers
STANAG 7165 is NATO's ratification agreement bringing AAMedP-1.9, Edition C - aeromedical guidance on investigating and managing laser eye damage in aircrew - into force among participating nations.
STANAG 7165 is the NATO Standardization Agreement covering the initial investigation and immediate management of laser eye damage in aircrew. It is the agreement, not the medical guidance itself: this is Edition 4, promulgated 5 September 2025, superseding Edition 3 of 11 November 2019, and it brings AAMedP-1.9, Edition C, into force for the nations that ratify it.
A STANAG is the agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement a standard, not the technical or clinical content itself. STANAG 7165's own text is short: a letter of promulgation, an aim, a single-line agreement, and the ratification and implementation machinery. The actual investigation and management steps for laser eye damage are set out in a separate publication, AAMedP-1.9, Edition C, which the STANAG names as the standard participating nations "agree to implement". Anyone actually investigating or managing a case needs AAMedP-1.9's own text, not this cover agreement.
The stated aim is "to respond to the following interoperability requirements", which the document gives as standardizing "the initial investigation and management of LASER eye damage in aircrew in order to facilitate medical assurance of practice and enhance interoperability". The current edition is a significant revision of the one it replaces: the letter of promulgation says AAMedP-1.9, Edition C "has been significantly revised from Edition B and must be read in its entirety", with its contents reordered and its format updated. STANAG 7165 lists no other related documents and supersedes "STANAG 7165, Edition 3, dated 11 November 2019".
STANAG 7165 binds nations, not suppliers. It is effective "upon receipt for use by the participating nations and NATO bodies", and it becomes binding on a given nation through ratification, which NATO records in the NATO Standardization Documents Database (NSDD). Implementation is a separate, further step: AAMedP-1.9 is "considered implemented when the entity has updated its procedures regarding the investigation of laser eye damage in aircrew and its medical personnel is able to act according to the provision of the present standard". In practical terms the document expects an implementing entity to update its own procedure, update and deliver training for the relevant medical personnel, train those personnel, and acquire and make available the equipment the standard calls for; the clinical detail behind each of those steps sits in AAMedP-1.9 itself. Allied nations and NATO bodies are then obliged to report implementation details through NATO's electronic reporting tool; partner nations are only invited to do the same. The STANAG names no NATO-wide effective date (its own "NATO EFFECTIVE DATE (NED)" field reads "Not applicable"), and the document itself sets no obligation reaching a supplier directly - a supplier meets it, or the AAMedP-1.9 guidance it covers, only where a contract says so.
STANAG 7165 describes no certification scheme and no audit. What it describes is nations reporting their ratification and implementation status to NATO for the record; nobody is "STANAG 7165 certified", and the document never uses that language. Review of the STANAG itself runs "in accordance with AAP-03", with the result recorded in the NSDD. It is supervised under the Military Committee's Air Standardization Board, through its Aeromedical Working Group.
STANAG 7165 covers AAMedP-1.9, the Allied Medical Publication that carries the actual investigation and management guidance; participating nations agree to implement it by name. Reviews of the STANAG itself, and the format the current edition of AAMedP-1.9 follows, both point to AAP-03.
Investigating and managing a case of laser eye damage in aircrew is done by trained medical personnel, working to AAMedP-1.9 itself, not in a compliance platform. Implementing STANAG 7165 is the surrounding organisational work: updating the relevant procedure, updating and delivering training for the medical personnel involved, training them, and holding the equipment the standard calls for.
What ComplyTrain does for that kind of work generally is give an organisation supporting an aeromedical function one auditable place to hold those procedures, the training records for the people involved, and the evidence trail - reviews, corrective actions, document control - that a government quality representative or an internal review would ask to see.
ComplyTrain does not investigate or manage a laser eye injury, examine an aircrew member, or decide whether a case has been handled to AAMedP-1.9's own requirements. That is clinical work, carried out by trained medical personnel against the publication itself.
Which STANAGs and Allied Publications actually apply to a given aeromedical programme is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. Browse the explorer to see what sits alongside STANAG 7165 and AAMedP-1.9, and talk to us about the evidence trail once you know which ones are in your contract.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 7165 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Only where a nation has ratified and implemented it, and it reaches a supplier only where a contract says so. The STANAG's own "NATO EFFECTIVE DATE (NED)" field reads "Not applicable", so there is no blanket start date to point to.
STANAG 7165 is the NATO ratification agreement; AAMedP-1.9, Edition C is the publication that actually sets out the investigation and management guidance. Ratifying STANAG 7165 is how a nation commits to implement AAMedP-1.9.
No. STANAG 7165 describes nations ratifying and reporting implementation to NATO, recorded in the NATO Standardization Documents Database. It names no certification or audit scheme for a supplier or a product.
The letter of promulgation states that this edition "has been significantly revised from Edition B and must be read in its entirety", with its contents reordered and its format updated. It does not set out the detail of those clinical changes here; that sits in AAMedP-1.9 itself.
No. It names AAMedP-1.9, Edition C as the standard participating nations "agree to implement"; the investigation and management content lives in that publication, not in this agreement.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
A 90-day plan for the smallest defence suppliers: let the tender set your scope, document what you already do, fix the security basics primes check, and keep the system small enough for two people to maintain.
Learn how to qualify, approve and monitor sub-suppliers, flow down requirements through purchase orders, and keep the records an auditor will ask to see under ISO 9001 clause 8.4 and AQAP.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.