Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 4628
Makers and integrators of military vehicle electrical and data systems who need CAN bus interoperability across NATO vehicle fleets, and the buyers who specify them.
STANAG 4628 is NATO's agreement on controller area network (CAN) protocols for military vehicle electrical systems. NATO has not released it publicly; this page describes it from the Czech defence standard that implements it and from NATO publications that cite it.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 4628 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on controller area network (CAN) protocols for military applications, edition 1, promulgated in March 2011 under the CNAD, AC/225 NAAG, LCGLE committee. NATO has not released STANAG 4628 publicly, so this page describes it from the Czech defence standard that implements it, ČOS 066002, and from NATO publications that cite it.
ČOS 066002 states that it specifies the technical conditions, based on available information, for the infrastructure and functional interface used when digital systems in a land military vehicle are connected into a single vehicle information system. Its scope is the electrical system of land military vehicles that contain digitally controlled systems and components, built on a high-speed data bus (HSDB) of type CAN 2.0 A/B, with communication between the vehicle's digital components secured by a specified communication protocol. The Czech standard's stated aim is to standardise the use of the CAN 2.0 A/B high-speed data bus in the electrical systems of Czech military vehicles, and to provide a single guideline for using CAN 2.0 A/B and its communication protocols in land military applications so that vehicle systems from different nations are compatible within NATO.
ČOS 066002 names a set of related documents that form the basis of the protocol it introduces: ISO 11898 for exchanging digital information over CAN at high transfer rates, EN 50325-4 (the CANopen specification), the MilCAN A and MilCAN B physical, data-link, application and system-management layer specifications, and SAE J1939 for serial control and communication on a vehicle network. It recommends using these related standards in their original English version to secure communication interoperability, and requires an organisation building a vehicle system for the Czech armed forces to apply whichever edition of the protocols the parties agreed to at the start of the project.
AEP-4754, NATO's agreement on the Generic Vehicle Architecture, describes CAN and STANAG 4628 as an example of an automotive bus-based network that sits outside its own architecture. It says such networks "will still be widely used in the near future as part of the Base Vehicle" because of their low cost, wide availability and the depth of existing knowledge in using them, and it requires an Automotive Network Gateway to carry their data into the NGVA Data Infrastructure. Where that infrastructure cannot provide the safety level a function needs, AEP-4754 allows multiple redundant CAN or STANAG 4628 buses to be used for the safety-critical function instead, interfacing to the rest of the vehicle through the same gateway. The related agreement STANAG 4754 lists STANAG 4628 among its other related documents, alongside STANAG 4697 (the extended video standard) and STANAG 4074 (auxiliary power unit connections).
A supplier bound by STANAG 4628 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 4628 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.