Management review that actually improves the business
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
STANAG 7158
Manufacturers and buyers of aircraft ground support equipment who must show it meets electromagnetic interference requirements before it operates near or connects to an aircraft.
STANAG 7158 is the NATO agreement on electromagnetic interference test methods for aerospace ground equipment. NATO has not released it publicly; this page describes it from the Czech defence standard that introduces it alongside AECTP-500.
NATO has not released this STANAG publicly. It is NATO UNCLASSIFIED, and organisations that need it obtain it through their national standardization authority.
STANAG 7158 is the NATO Standardization Agreement on electromagnetic interference, test methods for aerospace ground equipment. Edition 1, promulgated on 2 February 2009, under committee MC, MCASB, AE.
NATO has not released STANAG 7158 publicly. This page describes it from a public national implementation, the Czech defence standard ČOS 051627 (5th edition, amendment 2, 2025), which states it introduces AECTP-500 edition E (STANAG 4370 edition 7) together with STANAG 7158 edition 1 into Czech use, as one combined standard. A national implementation can add national requirements and reservations, so treat what follows as the Czech implementation's content, not as NATO's own text. A second Czech standard, ČOS 599903 on verifying the electromagnetic immunity of aircraft, also implemented STANAG 7158 alongside STANAG 3614, STANAG 3516 and STANAG 7116, but the national index records it as cancelled without replacement.
ČOS 051627 sets out to establish uniform test procedures and methods for determining the susceptibility of military materiel to the electrical and electromagnetic environment and its electromagnetic emissions. It contains generic test procedures and methods from which a specific test plan must be assembled for each application, and its structure follows the allied publication AECTP-500 edition E. The standard organises its tests into ten categories, numbered 501 to 510, covering equipment and subsystems, personal and portable equipment, ground support equipment, platforms and systems by domain (air, sea and land), munitions, space, and miscellaneous tests.
Category 503 sets out the minimum EMC test methods for evaluating ground support equipment across all three services (air, land and sea). Its stated aim is to improve international cooperation and standardisation between nations on regulating electromagnetic interference, both emissions and susceptibility, from ground support equipment. For aircraft ground support equipment (AGSE), the Czech implementation sets three importance categories that decide which tests apply: category E1 for equipment that is electrically connected to the aircraft or whose incorrect operation could endanger flight safety or the mission; category E2 for equipment that operates close to the aircraft, including inside a hardened aircraft shelter, without a direct electrical connection; and category E3 for equipment used away from the aircraft and the airfield apron. Ground forces' own support equipment is classified instead by its working distance from the nearest radio antenna, in four bands from under 2 metres to over 100 metres, because protecting nearby radio receivers from interference is the dominant concern for that equipment.
A supplier bound by STANAG 7158 through a contract holds the obtained text through its national authority. In ComplyTrain you record the requirements that apply to you as your own requirements, give each an owner, and keep the evidence that shows you meet them against each one.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 7158 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Learn how to run an ISO 9001 Clause 9.3 management review that turns evidence into decisions, with the right inputs, actionable outputs, and a cadence that fits your risks.
The types of ISO 9001 audit, what Stage 1 and Stage 2 each check, how nonconformities are graded and closed, and how to prepare for your first certification.
The EDF consortium rule is usually quoted as three entities from three Member States. It has a second limb about control that the word independent quietly hides, and two exceptions that disapply it entirely.