Platform
Modules
By sector
By sector
By standard
Blog
News
Events
STANAG 3114
National authorities implementing NATO aeromedical training interoperability for flight personnel, and the training providers or contractors whose programmes have to conform once a contract invokes it
STANAG 3114 is NATO's agreement for nations to implement AAMedP-1.2, the Allied Medical Publication on aeromedical training of flight personnel, so aircrew can fly another NATO nation's aircraft without additional training.
STANAG 3114 is a NATO standardization agreement, currently Edition 9 (dated 5 February 2018), by which participating nations commit to implement AAMedP-1.2, Edition A, the Allied Medical Publication that sets NATO's aeromedical training requirements for flight personnel. The STANAG itself carries no aeromedical content: it is the ratification and implementation mechanism, not the specification. What AAMedP-1.2 actually requires of a training programme is outside the scope of this page. Edition 9 supersedes the previous edition, STANAG 3114 AMD, Edition 8, though the document in front of us does not give that earlier edition's date.
The agreement's stated aim is to respond to an interoperability requirement: "to standardize the aeromedical training required for flight personnel in order to promote safety and efficiency in the operation of military aircraft and to allow aircrew of one NATO nation to fly in equivalent aircraft of another nation without additional aeromedical training." In other words, the problem this STANAG solves is duplicated or incompatible aeromedical training across NATO nations, which would otherwise mean an aircrew member posted to fly an ally's equivalent aircraft type needing to be retrained from scratch.
A STANAG is not itself a technical specification a training officer or contractor reads and builds a course from. It is the agreement by which NATO nations commit to implement the publication it covers - here, AAMedP-1.2. That mechanism is the single thing most readers get wrong about a STANAG: it binds the nations that ratify it, not training providers or suppliers directly. The letter of promulgation records that the agreement "has been ratified by member nations, as reflected in the NATO Standardization Document Database," and a nation implements it "when a nation has issued the necessary orders/instructions to the forces concerned putting the details of the agreement into effect." Partner nations sit outside ratification: they are separately "invited to adopt this STANAG." A supplier or training provider meets STANAG 3114 only once a national implementation, or a contract that references it, requires training against AAMedP-1.2 - and by that point, the interoperability the STANAG describes needs to already be designed into the training programme, because retrofitting aeromedical training after aircrew are already qualified the wrong way is far more disruptive than building to the common standard from the start.
Ratification and implementation are two separate steps, both tracked through the NATO Standardization Document Database (NSDD). Nations are invited to "examine their ratification of the STANAG and, if they have not already done so, advise the NSO of their intention regarding its implementation," and are separately "requested to provide to the NSO their actual STANAG implementation details." Once implemented, nations are "invited to report on their effective implementation of the STANAG using the form in Annex H to AAP-03"; partner nations use Annex G of the same publication to report their adoption. The STANAG itself "is to be reviewed at least once every three years," with the outcome recorded in the NSDD, and any nation or NATO body may propose a change at any time through the tasking authority.
The document lists several other STANAGs and publications as related reading, not as prerequisites: STANAG 3474 (temporary flying restrictions due to exogenous factors affecting aircrew efficiency), STANAG 3497 (aeromedical training of aircrew in CBRN equipment and procedures), STANAG 3827 (minimum requirements for physiological training of aircrew in a high-G environment, carrying AAMedP-1.13), STANAG 7078 (use of helicopter emergency underwater breathing apparatus, carrying AAMedP-1.19), and STANAG 7147 (aeromedical aspects of night vision device training, carrying AAMedP-1.21). Two further documents, AIR STD ASM 3003 and ADV PUB ASM 3009, are named in the cover but sit outside our catalogue, as does AAP-06, the NATO glossary of terms and definitions.
NATO's Standardization Document Database lists the catalogue entry and serves the unclassified document. NATO's standardization agreements are free of charge; we do not sell them, host copies, or charge for access. See the record on the NSDD.
STANAG 3114 is an operational standard, not a management system, so the work it brings into force - aeromedical training against AAMedP-1.2 - is delivered in aircrew training and evaluation, not in software. ComplyTrain helps a training organisation hold that work as evidence: a documented training procedure that reflects AAMedP-1.2's requirements, individual training records for aircrew members, the record of a nation's implementation orders once issued, and the documentation a review or an audit would expect to see.
We make no claim to deliver aeromedical training ourselves, and we do not write or interpret AAMedP-1.2's technical content. There is no certification to earn against STANAG 3114: what a nation reports is its own ratification and implementation, through the NSDD and the AAP-03 annexes, not an assessment issued by an accredited or notified body.
The applicable tier here, and the publications that come with it, is set by the contract and the customer's quality clause, not by us. Use the standards explorer to see what sits alongside STANAG 3114, and talk to us about the evidence a training programme like this needs to hold.
Tell us how you need to work with STANAG 3114 and what you need from it. We will come back to you about what ComplyTrain can do.
Thank you. Your list is on its way to your inbox, and we will come back to you on what working with these standards in ComplyTrain involves, usually within one business day.
Not on its own. A STANAG binds the nations that ratify it, and a nation can ratify with reservations; whether it binds a particular training programme or contractor depends on whether a national implementation or a contract invokes AAMedP-1.2, the publication this STANAG brings into force.
The STANAG itself requires nothing technical: it is the agreement by which nations commit to implement AAMedP-1.2, Edition A, NATO's Allied Medical Publication on aeromedical training of flight personnel. The training content lives in that publication, not in this cover agreement.
No. The document describes no accredited certification scheme. What it describes is national ratification and implementation, recorded through the NSDD and reported using the Annex H and Annex G forms in AAP-03.
Ratification is a nation's decision to adopt the STANAG, recorded in the NSDD. Implementation follows once that nation has issued the orders and instructions needed to put the agreement into effect for its own forces - the two are tracked and reported separately.
At least once every three years, with the result recorded in the NATO Standardization Document Database. Nations and NATO bodies can propose changes at any time through the tasking authority, processed during that review.
One system for the whole compliance programme. Start with the module you need most.
Collect information the same way every time, and decide in advance what happens next.
Know whether your controls are operating, not just whether a policy says they exist.
Turn the compliance work you already know about into a plan with owners, dependencies and dates.
Know what you can offer, and hold the evidence behind every configuration you offer it in.
Eight built-in reports across every module, scheduled, delivered, and filed where the evidence lives.
The sector news that matters to your organisation - read and rated by AI, and delivered as a scheduled digest in your own language.
AI reads the tender pack and pulls out the requirements, deadlines and rules - then helps you draft the response from your own approved content, with you reviewing every step.
One current register of the suppliers and partners you depend on - each risk-assessed, re-assessing itself on schedule, and wired straight into your risk register.
See every requirement you face - across every standard, plus your own contracts and policies - traced to the documents, evidence and processes that satisfy it.
Identify, score, treat and review your risks in one place - with AI to help anyone run a proper assessment, and a defensible trail behind every decision.
Assign training, prove it was understood, and hold the competence records an auditor asks for.
Draft compliance documents with AI, keep every version under control, and export them beautifully branded - all in one place.
Audits, corrective actions, processes and approvals in one quality system, organised around ISO 9001.
Medical device manufacturers operate under more regulatory pressure than almost any other sector outside pharmaceuticals. The rules govern how you design a device, how you make it, how you track it after it ships, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
Learn how EU dual-use export controls apply to encryption, sensors, and software, how classification works under Annex I, and why sending source code by email can count as an export.
A practical way to turn in-your-head risk management into a register that survives staff turnover and answers the risk questions now showing up in tenders.